linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 12/12] dt-bindings: net: add Microchip's LAN865X 10BASE-T1S MACPHY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240322-bronzing-gangrene-486296d6117c@spud>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 18:08:08 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com
Cc: krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org, andrew@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
	horms@...nel.org, saeedm@...dia.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	corbet@....net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Horatiu.Vultur@...rochip.com,
	ruanjinjie@...wei.com, Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com,
	vladimir.oltean@....com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
	Thorsten.Kummermehr@...rochip.com, Pier.Beruto@...emi.com,
	Selvamani.Rajagopal@...emi.com, Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com,
	benjamin.bigler@...nformulastudent.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 12/12] dt-bindings: net: add Microchip's
 LAN865X 10BASE-T1S MACPHY

On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 06:25:02AM +0000, Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com wrote:
> Ah ok, now I understand this. Then it is supposed to be like below,
> 
> properties: 
> 
>    compatible: 
> 
>      oneOf: 
> 
>        - const: microchip,lan8650 
> 
>        - items: 
> 
>            - const: microchip,lan8651 
> 
>            - const: microchip,lan8650
> 
> Executed dt_binding_check with the above update and it was successful. 
> Hope this is OK?

That looks about what I would expect to see, yes.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)