[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240322180753.5612-1-kiryushin@ancud.ru>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 21:07:53 +0300
From: Nikita Kiryushin <kiryushin@...ud.ru>
To: Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>
Cc: Nikita Kiryushin <kiryushin@...ud.ru>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
acpica-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lvc-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ACPICA: debugger: check status of acpi_evaluate_object in acpi_db_walk_for_fields
ACPICA commit 9061cd9aa131205657c811a52a9f8325a040c6c9
Errors in acpi_evaluate_object can lead to incorrect state of buffer.
This can lead to access to data in previously ACPI_FREEd buffer and
secondary ACPI_FREE to the same buffer later.
Handle errors in acpi_evaluate_object the same way it is done earlier
with acpi_ns_handle_to_pathname.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/9061cd9a
Fixes: 5fd033288a86 ("ACPICA: debugger: add command to dump all fields of particular subtype")
Signed-off-by: Nikita Kiryushin <kiryushin@...ud.ru>
---
v2: Add ACPICA project git links for corresponding changes
drivers/acpi/acpica/dbnames.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/dbnames.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/dbnames.c
index b91155ea9c34..c9131259f717 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/dbnames.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/dbnames.c
@@ -550,8 +550,12 @@ acpi_db_walk_for_fields(acpi_handle obj_handle,
ACPI_FREE(buffer.pointer);
buffer.length = ACPI_ALLOCATE_LOCAL_BUFFER;
- acpi_evaluate_object(obj_handle, NULL, NULL, &buffer);
-
+ status = acpi_evaluate_object(obj_handle, NULL, NULL, &buffer);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+ acpi_os_printf("Could Not evaluate object %p\n",
+ obj_handle);
+ return (AE_OK);
+ }
/*
* Since this is a field unit, surround the output in braces
*/
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists