[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALu+AoT4BBFRw7P4gYWBq1PK=Qe2iR=d5YLUY_JyY2CU3SMrYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 13:20:40 +0800
From: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
To: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] x86/kexec: do not update E820 kexec table for setup_data
> > Your tree is missing this recent commit:
> > 7fd817c906503b6813ea3b41f5fdf4192449a707 ("x86/e820: Don't
> > reserve SETUP_RNG_SEED in e820").
> >
> > Wouldn't this fix [/paper over] your problem as well? I.e., isn't
> > SETUP_RNG_SEED the setup_data item that's causing your problem?
>
> Thanks for catching this, I will rebase and repost.
>
> But it does not "fix" the problem as my problem is related to the
> other setup_data
> range, I think it is SETUP_PCI (not 100% sure, but it is certainly not RNG_SEED)
>
The webmail reply broke the lines randomly, sorry for that. I have
resent a rebased version. And I also confirmed that in my case it was
SETUP_PCI caused the issue. Note, this SETUP_PCI is from previous
physical bootup, the old kernel reserved it in kexec e820, it is not
the RNG_SEED which was passed in by kexec. I believe the RND_SEED
region could cause issues only on the 3rd+ boot with a kernel without
the commit you mentioned.
It is a little tricky, I suppose not obvious to understand..
Thanks
Dave
Powered by blists - more mailing lists