linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: qcom: add IPQ9574 interconnect clocks support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 06:45:33 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org,
 krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, djakov@...nel.org,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: qcom: add IPQ9574 interconnect clocks support

On 21/03/2024 10:56, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 08:25:15AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 21/03/2024 05:31, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
>>> Unlike MSM platforms that manage NoC related clocks and scaling
>>> from RPM, IPQ SoCs dont involve RPM in managing NoC related
>>> clocks and there is no NoC scaling.
>>
>> If these are clocks, expose them as clocks, not as interconnects.
> 
> Earlier IPQ9574 PCIe patches were NAK-ed when these were exposed
> as clocks. Please refer to the following discussions
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/CAA8EJpq0uawrOBHA8XHygEpGYF--HyxJWxKG44iiFdAZZz7O2w@mail.gmail.com/
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/CAA8EJppabK8j9T40waMv=t-1aksXfqJibWuS41GhruzLhpatrg@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> Dmitry had said
> 	<quote>
> 	I'd kindly suggest implementing the NoC attachment
> 	properly. In the end, other Qualcomm platforms use ICC
> 	drivers, so by following this pattern we will have more
> 	common code paths.
> 	</quote>
> 
> Hence posted these patches to get feedback.

Then explain the rationale in commit msg.

Best regards,
Krzysztof