lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 09:05:32 +0000
From: Roman Smirnov <r.smirnov@....ru>
To: "jaegeuk@...nel.org" <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, "chao@...nel.org"
	<chao@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
	<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>, "Karina
 Yankevich" <k.yankevich@....ru>, "lvc-project@...uxtesting.org"
	<lvc-project@...uxtesting.org>
Subject: [bug report] fs: f2fs: integer overflow in
 f2fs_truncate_inode_blocks()

Hello. 

There is a possible bug in f2fs_truncate_inode_blocks():

    if (err < 0 && err != -ENOENT)
    			goto fail;
        ...
        offset[1] = 0;
        offset[0]++;
        nofs += err;

If err = -ENOENT then nofs will sum with an error code,
which is strange behaviour. Also if nofs < ENOENT this will
cause an overflow. err will be equal to -ENOENT with the
following call stack:

truncate_nodes()
  f2fs_get_node_page()
     __get_node_page()
        read_node_page()

It looks like ENOENT processing is missing here. What can you
say about it? How can it be fixed?

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with the
Svace static analysis tool.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ