[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <93e4f096-47df-9eba-095f-e8a8c3cd04f5@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:30:28 +0200 (EET)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>,
Maciej Wieczór-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/13] selftests/resctrl: Convert ctrlgrp & mongrp to
pointers
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> On 3/11/2024 6:52 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > The struct resctrl_val_param has control and monitor groups as char
> > arrays but they are not supposed to be mutated within resctrl_val().
> >
> > Convert the ctrlgrp and mongrp char array within resctrl_val_param to
> > plain const char pointers and adjust the strlen() based checks to
> > check NULL instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h | 4 ++--
> > tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c | 8 ++++----
> > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
> > index 52769b075233..54e5bce4c698 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
> > @@ -89,8 +89,8 @@ struct resctrl_test {
> > */
> > struct resctrl_val_param {
> > char *resctrl_val;
> > - char ctrlgrp[64];
> > - char mongrp[64];
> > + const char *ctrlgrp;
> > + const char *mongrp;
> > char filename[64];
> > unsigned long mask;
> > int num_of_runs;
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
> > index 79cf1c593106..dbe0cc6d74fa 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
> > @@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ static int create_grp(const char *grp_name, char *grp, const char *parent_grp)
> > * length of grp_name == 0, it means, user wants to use root con_mon
> > * grp, so do nothing
> > */
>
> Could you please confirm that the comments are still accurate?
It's not, I missed it.
> > - if (strlen(grp_name) == 0)
> > + if (!grp_name)
> > return 0;
But now when looking into the surrounding code, to me it looks the correct
action here is to remove the comment and return -1 instead of 0. It makes
this just an internal sanity check that grp_name is provided by the
caller.
--
i.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists