[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <230eab52-9751-43fd-8e47-fbfe12410e44@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 12:35:34 +0000
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: usb: qcom,pmic-typec: drop port
description
On 22/03/2024 11:52, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> The PMIC Type-C controller doesn't have separate role-switching signal.
> Instead it has an HS signal connection between embedded USB-C connector
> node and the HS port of the USB controller.
I take your point on port as a signal but the way type-c determines
data-role is via the DR_Swap message.
https://www.embedded.com/usb-type-c-and-power-delivery-101-power-delivery-protocol/
We receive an IRQ which is a packet containing DR_Swap - TCPM consumes
that data and does a data-role switch.
The port then establishes the link between typec-port and redriver or PHY.
So, I think HS should be dropped from the commit logs and names in both
series.
BTW for the GLINK devices I think the adsp firmware just notifies the
APSS of the data-role switch so, these types of devices probably should
have an epdoint with "usb_role_switch" in the name.
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists