linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/shstk: Enable shadow stack for x32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7b341bef9c0cab324350873cab75b7e1313a5172.camel@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:07:27 +0000
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
To: "hjl.tools@...il.com" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/shstk: Enable shadow stack for x32

On Fri, 2024-03-15 at 07:34 -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > How many people do you think will use this?

I'm concerned that the only use of this will ever be exercise via the
glibc unit tests, but will still require work to support.

> > 
> > I would have thought it would require more changes for basic x32
> 
> This is all needed.
> 
> > operation. What was the testing exactly?
> 
> I configured x32 glibc with --enable-cet, build glibc and
> run all glibc tests with shadow stack enabled.  There are
> no regressions.  I verified that shadow stack is enabled
> via /proc/pid/status.

The shadow stack is supposed to be mapped above 4G, so how is this
supposed to work for x32?