linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] DAMON based 2-tier memory management for CXL memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240322163914.68475-1-sj@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 09:39:14 -0700
From: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
To: Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@...com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>,
	damon@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	apopple@...dia.com,
	baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
	dave.jiang@...el.com,
	hyeongtak.ji@...com,
	kernel_team@...ynix.com,
	linmiaohe@...wei.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
	mhiramat@...nel.org,
	rakie.kim@...com,
	rostedt@...dmis.org,
	surenb@...gle.com,
	yangx.jy@...itsu.com,
	ying.huang@...el.com,
	ziy@...dia.com,
	42.hyeyoo@...il.com,
	art.jeongseob@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] DAMON based 2-tier memory management for CXL memory

On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 17:27:34 +0900 Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@...com> wrote:

[...]
> OK. It could be a matter of preference and the current filter is already
> in the mainline so I won't insist more.

Thank you for accepting my humble suggestion.

[...]
> > I'd prefer improving the documents or
> > user-space tool and keep the kernel code simple.
> 
> OK. I will see if there is a way to improve damo tool for this instead
> of making changes on the kernel side.

Looking forward!

[...]
> Yeah, I made this thread too much about filter naming discussion rather
> than tiered memory support.

No problem at all.  Thank you for keeping this productive discussion.

[...]
> Thanks again for your feedback.

That's my pleasure :)


Thanks,
SJ

[...]