linux-kernel - Re: [syzbot] [PATCH] fix array-index-out-of-bounds in bpf_prog_select

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <000000000000cd321c06145bd37f@google.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 15:54:48 -0700
From: syzbot <syzbot+d2a2c639d03ac200a4f1@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [PATCH] fix array-index-out-of-bounds in bpf_prog_select_runtime

For archival purposes, forwarding an incoming command email to
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org.

***

Subject: [PATCH] fix array-index-out-of-bounds in bpf_prog_select_runtime
Author: cam.alvarez.i@...il.com

Please test the following

#syz test

BPF documentation specifies that the maximum stack depth for a BPF
program is 512 bytes. This is not enforced when selecting a bpf
interpreter, thus casuing an index out of bounds error when trying to
obtain an interpreter with a bigger stack size.

This patch enforces the stack size to be not bigger than
512.

Signed-off-by: Camila Alvarez <cam.alvarez.i@...il.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/core.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 696bc55de8e8..8167b3a721e9 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -2196,7 +2196,7 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn)
 		BUG_ON(1);
 		return 0;
 }
-
+#define BPF_MAX_STACK_SIZE 512
 #define PROG_NAME(stack_size) __bpf_prog_run##stack_size
 #define DEFINE_BPF_PROG_RUN(stack_size) \
 static unsigned int PROG_NAME(stack_size)(const void *ctx, const struct bpf_insn *insn) \
@@ -2345,7 +2345,7 @@ static void bpf_prog_select_func(struct bpf_prog *fp)
 {
 #ifndef CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON
 	u32 stack_depth = max_t(u32, fp->aux->stack_depth, 1);
-
+	stack_depth = min_t(u32, stack_depth, BPF_MAX_STACK_SIZE);
 	fp->bpf_func = interpreters[(round_up(stack_depth, 32) / 32) - 1];
 #else
 	fp->bpf_func = __bpf_prog_ret0_warn;
-- 
2.34.1