[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87msqnrivf.fsf@kurt.kurt.home>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 12:04:20 +0100
From: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Sagi Maimon <maimon.sagi@...il.com>
Cc: richardcochran@...il.com, luto@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
arnd@...db.de, geert@...ux-m68k.org, peterz@...radead.org,
hannes@...xchg.org, sohil.mehta@...el.com, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com,
nphamcs@...il.com, palmer@...ive.com, keescook@...omium.org,
legion@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, mszeredi@...hat.com,
casey@...aufler-ca.com, reibax@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
brauner@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] posix-timers: add clock_compare system call
On Sat Mar 23 2024, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23 2024 at 01:38, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> PTP_SYS_OFFSET_EXTENDED moves the outer sample points as close as
>> possible to the actual PCH read and provides both outer samples to user
>> space for analysis. It was introduced for a reason, no?
>
> That said, it's a sad state of affairs that 16 drivers which did exist
> before the introduction of the gettimex64() callback have not been
> converted over to it within 4.5 years.
>
> What's even worse is that 14 drivers have been merged _after_ the
> gettimex64() callback got introduced without implementing it:
>
[...]
> 2020-11-05 drivers/net/dsa/hirschmann/hellcreek_ptp.c
Oh, my bad. Let me switch this one to gettimex64() then.
Thanks,
Kurt
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (862 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists