| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAGWkznEzpcWi4oXVn_WFahnQj3dHcwc_4VW6m1Ss-KJ8mD3F3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:14:27 +0800
From: Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@...il.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: 黄朝阳 (Zhaoyang Huang) <zhaoyang.huang@...soc.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
康纪滨 (Steve Kang) <Steve.Kang@...soc.com>
Subject: Re: summarize all information again at bottom//reply: reply: [PATCH]
mm: fix a race scenario in folio_isolate_lru
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 11:20 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 09:52:36AM +0800, Zhaoyang Huang wrote:
> > Thanks for the comments. fix the typo and update the timing sequence
> > by amending possible preempt points to have the refcnt make sense.
> >
> > 0. Thread_bad gets the folio by find_get_entry and preempted before
> > take refcnt(could be the second round scan of
> > truncate_inode_pages_range)
> > refcnt == 1(page_cache), PG_lru == true, PG_lock == false
> > find_get_entry
> > folio = xas_find
> > <preempted>
> > folio_try_get_rcu
> >
> > 1. Thread_filemap get the folio via
> > filemap_map_pages->next_uptodate_folio->xas_next_entry and gets preempted
> > refcnt == 1(page_cache), PG_lru == true, PG_lock == false
> > filemap_map_pages
> > next_uptodate_folio
> > xas_next_entry
> > <preempted>
> > folio_try_get_rcu
> >
> > 2. Thread_truncate get the folio via
> > truncate_inode_pages_range->find_lock_entries
> > refcnt == 2(page_cache, fbatch_truncate), PG_lru == true, PG_lock == true
> >
> > 3. Thread_truncate proceed to truncate_cleanup_folio
> > refcnt == 2(page_cache, fbatch_truncate), PG_lru == true, PG_lock == true
> >
> > 4. Thread_truncate proceed to delete_from_page_cache_batch
> > refcnt == 1(fbatch_truncate), PG_lru == true, PG_lock == true
> >
> > 4.1 folio_unlock
> > refcnt == 1(fbatch_truncate), PG_lru == true, PG_lock == false
>
> OK, so by the time we get to folio_unlock(), the folio has been removed
> from the i_pages xarray.
>
> > 5. Thread_filemap schedule back from '1' and proceed to setup a pte
> > and have folio->_mapcnt = 0 & folio->refcnt += 1
> > refcnt == 1->2(+fbatch_filemap)->3->2(pte, fbatch_truncate),
> > PG_lru == true, PG_lock == true->false
>
> This line succeeds (in next_uptodate_folio):
> if (!folio_try_get_rcu(folio))
> continue;
> but then this fails:
>
> if (unlikely(folio != xas_reload(xas)))
> goto skip;
> skip:
> folio_put(folio);
>
> because xas_reload() will return NULL due to the folio being deleted
> in step 4. So we never get to the point where we set up a PTE.
>
> There should be no way to create a new PTE for a folio which has been
> removed from the page cache. Bugs happen, of course, but I don't see
> one yet.
>
> > 6. Thread_madv clear folio's PG_lru by
> > madvise_xxx_pte_range->folio_isolate_lru->folio_test_clear_lru
> > refcnt == 2(pte,fbatch_truncate), PG_lru == false, PG_lock == false
> >
> > 7. Thread_truncate call folio_fbatch_release and failed in freeing
> > folio as refcnt not reach 0
> > refcnt == 1(pte), PG_lru == false, PG_lock == false
> > ********folio becomes an orphan here which is not on the page cache
> > but on the task's VM**********
> >
> > 8. Thread_bad scheduled back from '0' to be collected in fbatch_bad
> > refcnt == 2(pte, fbatch_bad), PG_lru == false, PG_lock == true
> >
> > 9. Thread_bad clear one refcnt wrongly when doing filemap_remove_folio
> > as it take this refcnt as the page cache one
> > refcnt == 1(fbatch_bad), PG_lru == false, PG_lock == true->false
> > truncate_inode_folio
> > filemap_remove_folio
> > filemap_free_folio
> > ******refcnt decreased wrongly here by being taken as the page cache one ******
> >
> > 10. Thread_bad calls release_pages(fbatch_bad) and has the folio
> > introduce the bug.
> > release_pages
> > folio_put_testzero == true
> > folio_test_lru == false
> > list_add(folio->lru, pages_to_free)
ok. It seems like madvise is robust enough to leave no BUGs. I presume
another two scenarios which call folio_isloate_lru by any other ways
but PTE. Besides, scenario 2 reminds me of a previous bug reported by
me as find_get_entry entered in a livelock where the folio's refcnt ==
0 but remains at xarray which causes the reset->retry loops forever. I
would like to reply in that thread for more details.
Scenario 1:
0. Thread_bad gets the folio by find_get_entry and preempted before
folio_lock (could be the second round scan of
truncate_inode_pages_range)
refcnt == 2(page_cache, fbatch_bad), PG_lru == true, PG_lock == false
folio = find_get_entry
folio_try_get_rcu
<preempted>
folio_try_lock
1. Thread_truncate get the folio via
truncate_inode_pages_range->find_lock_entries
refcnt == 3(page_cache, fbatch_bad, fbatch_truncate), PG_lru ==
true, PG_lock == true
2. Thread_truncate proceed to truncate_cleanup_folio
refcnt == 3(page_cache, fbatch_bad, fbatch_truncate), PG_lru ==
true, PG_lock == true
3. Thread_truncate proceed to delete_from_page_cache_batch
refcnt == 2(fbatch_bad, fbatch_truncate), PG_lru == true, PG_lock == true
4 folio_unlock
refcnt == 2(fbatch_bad, fbatch_truncate), PG_lru == true, PG_lock == false
5. Thread_bad schedule back from step 0 and clear one refcnt wrongly
when doing truncate_inode_folio->filemap_remove_folio as it take this
refcnt as the page cache one
refcnt == 1'(fbatch_truncate), PG_lru == false, PG_lock == true
folio = find_get_entry
folio_try_get_rcu
folio_try_lock
truncate_inode_folio
filemap_remove_folio
<preempted>
6. Thread_isolate get one refcnt and call folio_isolate_lru(could be
any process)
refcnt == 2'(fbatch_truncate, thread_isolate), PG_lru == true,
PG_lock == true
7. Thread_isolate proceed to clear PG_lru and get preempted before folio_get
refcnt == 2'(fbatch_truncate, thread_isolate), PG_lru == false,
PG_lock == true
folio_test_clear_folio
<preempted>
folio_get
8. Thread_bad scheduling back from step 5 and proceed to drop one refcnt
refcnt == 1'(thread_isolate), PG_lru == false, PG_lock == true
folio = find_get_entry
folio_try_get_rcu
folio_try_lock
truncate_inode_folio
filemap_remove_folio
folio_unlock
<preempted>
9. Thread_truncate schedule back from step 3 and proceed to drop one
refcnt by release_pages and hit the BUG
refcnt == 0'(thread_isolate), PG_lru == false, PG_lock == false
Scenario 2:
0. Thread_bad gets the folio by find_get_entry and preempted before
folio_lock (could be the second round scan of
truncate_inode_pages_range)
refcnt == 2(page_cache, fbatch_bad), PG_lru == true, PG_lock == false
folio = find_get_entry
folio_try_get_rcu
<preempted>
folio_try_lock
1. Thread_readahead remove the folio from page cache and drop one
refcnt by filemap_remove_folio(get rid of the folios which failed to
launch IO during readahead)
refcnt == 1(fbatch_bad), PG_lru == true, PG_lock == true
2. folio_unlock
refcnt == 1(fbatch_bad), PG_lru == true, PG_lock == false
3. Thread_isolate get one refcnt and call folio_isolate_lru(could be
any process)
refcnt == 2(fbatch_bad, thread_isolate), PG_lru == true, PG_lock == false
4. Thread_bad schedule back from step 0 and clear one refcnt wrongly
when doing truncate_inode_folio->filemap_remove_folio as it take this
refcnt as the page cache one
refcnt == 1'(thread_isolate), PG_lru == false, PG_lock == false
find_get_entries
folio = find_get_entry
folio_try_get_rcu
folio_lock
<no check as folio->mapping != mapping as folio_lock_entries does>
truncate_inode_folio
filemap_remove_folio
<preempted>
5. Thread_isolate proceed to clear PG_lru and get preempted before folio_get
refcnt == 1'(fbatch_truncate, thread_isolate), PG_lru == false,
PG_lock == false
folio_test_clear_folio
<preempted>
folio_get
6. Thread_bad schedule back from step 4 and proceed to drop one refcnt
by release_pages and hit the BUG
refcnt == 0'(thread_isolate), PG_lru == false, PG_lock == false
Powered by blists - more mailing lists