[an error occurred while processing this directive]
lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240324124546.2e07f802@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 12:45:46 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
Cc: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@...log.com>, lars@...afoo.de,
 Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
 krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: adc: Add support for AD4000

On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 16:53:17 -0500

> > +
> > +       /*
> > +        * DMA (thus cache coherency maintenance) requires the
> > +        * transfer buffers to live in their own cache lines.
> > +        */
> > +       union {
> > +               struct {
> > +                       u8 sample_buf[4];
> > +                       s64 timestamp;  
> 
> Usually we see __aligned(8) applied to the timestamp (I'm guessing
> some archs need it?)
> 
Good spot. Yes, x86_32 is the one that we most commonly refer to for this.
It aligns s64 to only 32 bits whereas IIO ABI is always naturally aligned.

> > +               } scan;
> > +               u8 d8[2];
> > +       } data __aligned(IIO_DMA_MINALIGN);
> > +};

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ