linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] clk: qcom: apss-ipq-pll: remove 'pll_type' field from struct 'apss_pll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 08:29:21 +0100
From: Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@...il.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
 Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
 <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] clk: qcom: apss-ipq-pll: remove 'pll_type' field
 from struct 'apss_pll_data'

2024. 03. 22. 23:33 keltezéssel, Dmitry Baryshkov írta:

..

>> Although my opinion that it is redundant still stand, but I'm not against
>> keeping the pll_type. However if we keep that, then at least we should use
>> private enums (IPQ_APSS_PLL_TYPE_* or similar) for that in order to make it more
>> obvious that it means a different thing than the CLK_ALPHA_PLL_TYPE_* values.
>>
>> This solution would be more acceptable?
> 
> This looks like a slight overkill, but yes, it is more acceptable. The
> logic should be type => functions, not the other way around.
> 
> 

If that is overkill, it does not worth the change. I will drop the patch and
send an updated series.

Regards,
Gabor