linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 029/238] do_sys_name_to_handle(): use kzalloc() to fix kernel-infoleak

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240324234027.1354210-30-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:36:57 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Nikita Zhandarovich <n.zhandarovich@...tech.ru>,
	Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
	syzbot+09b349b3066c2e0b1e96@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 029/238] do_sys_name_to_handle(): use kzalloc() to fix kernel-infoleak

From: Nikita Zhandarovich <n.zhandarovich@...tech.ru>

[ Upstream commit 3948abaa4e2be938ccdfc289385a27342fb13d43 ]

syzbot identified a kernel information leak vulnerability in
do_sys_name_to_handle() and issued the following report [1].

[1]
"BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline]
BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in _copy_to_user+0xbc/0x100 lib/usercopy.c:40
 instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline]
 _copy_to_user+0xbc/0x100 lib/usercopy.c:40
 copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:191 [inline]
 do_sys_name_to_handle fs/fhandle.c:73 [inline]
 __do_sys_name_to_handle_at fs/fhandle.c:112 [inline]
 __se_sys_name_to_handle_at+0x949/0xb10 fs/fhandle.c:94
 __x64_sys_name_to_handle_at+0xe4/0x140 fs/fhandle.c:94
 ...

Uninit was created at:
 slab_post_alloc_hook+0x129/0xa70 mm/slab.h:768
 slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3478 [inline]
 __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x5c9/0x970 mm/slub.c:3517
 __do_kmalloc_node mm/slab_common.c:1006 [inline]
 __kmalloc+0x121/0x3c0 mm/slab_common.c:1020
 kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:604 [inline]
 do_sys_name_to_handle fs/fhandle.c:39 [inline]
 __do_sys_name_to_handle_at fs/fhandle.c:112 [inline]
 __se_sys_name_to_handle_at+0x441/0xb10 fs/fhandle.c:94
 __x64_sys_name_to_handle_at+0xe4/0x140 fs/fhandle.c:94
 ...

Bytes 18-19 of 20 are uninitialized
Memory access of size 20 starts at ffff888128a46380
Data copied to user address 0000000020000240"

Per Chuck Lever's suggestion, use kzalloc() instead of kmalloc() to
solve the problem.

Fixes: 990d6c2d7aee ("vfs: Add name to file handle conversion support")
Suggested-by: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: <syzbot+09b349b3066c2e0b1e96@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Zhandarovich <n.zhandarovich@...tech.ru>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240119153906.4367-1-n.zhandarovich@fintech.ru
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/fhandle.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/fhandle.c b/fs/fhandle.c
index 01263ffbc4c08..9a5f153c8919e 100644
--- a/fs/fhandle.c
+++ b/fs/fhandle.c
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static long do_sys_name_to_handle(struct path *path,
 	if (f_handle.handle_bytes > MAX_HANDLE_SZ)
 		return -EINVAL;

-	handle = kmalloc(sizeof(struct file_handle) + f_handle.handle_bytes,
+	handle = kzalloc(sizeof(struct file_handle) + f_handle.handle_bytes,
 			 GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!handle)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-- 
2.43.0