linux-kernel - [PATCH 6.7 326/713] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Check that the RID domain is S1 in SVA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 18:40:52 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
	Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.7 326/713] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Check that the RID domain is S1 in SVA

From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>

[ Upstream commit ae91f6552c301e5e8569667e9d5440d5f75a90c4 ]

The SVA code only works if the RID domain is a S1 domain and has already
installed the cdtable.

Originally the check for this was in arm_smmu_sva_bind() but when the op
was removed the test didn't get copied over to the new
arm_smmu_sva_set_dev_pasid().

Without the test wrong usage usually will hit a WARN_ON() in
arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc() due to a missing ctx table.

However, the next patches wil change things so that an IDENTITY domain is
not a struct arm_smmu_domain and this will get into memory corruption if
the struct is wrongly casted.

Fail in arm_smmu_sva_set_dev_pasid() if the STE does not have a S1, which
is a proxy for the STE having a pointer to the CD table. Write it in a way
that will be compatible with the next patches.

Fixes: 386fa64fd52b ("arm-smmu-v3/sva: Add SVA domain support")
Reported-by: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/2a828e481416405fb3a4cceb9e075a59@huawei.com/
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/11-v6-96275f25c39d+2d4-smmuv3_newapi_p1_jgg@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c
index 4a27fbdb2d844..2610e82c0ecd0 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c
@@ -364,7 +364,13 @@ static int __arm_smmu_sva_bind(struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid,
 	struct arm_smmu_bond *bond;
 	struct arm_smmu_master *master = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
 	struct iommu_domain *domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(dev);
-	struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
+	struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain;
+
+	if (!(domain->type & __IOMMU_DOMAIN_PAGING))
+		return -ENODEV;
+	smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
+	if (smmu_domain->stage != ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S1)
+		return -ENODEV;
 
 	if (!master || !master->sva_enabled)
 		return -ENODEV;
-- 
2.43.0