[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240324230116.1348576-587-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:00:23 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@...dex.ru>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.6 586/638] soc: fsl: dpio: fix kcalloc() argument order
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
[ Upstream commit 72ebb41b88f9d7c10c5e159e0507074af0a22fe2 ]
A previous bugfix added a call to kcalloc(), which starting in gcc-14
causes a harmless warning about the argument order:
drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c: In function 'dpaa2_io_service_enqueue_multiple_desc_fq':
drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c:526:29: error: 'kcalloc' sizes specified with 'sizeof' in the earlier argument and not in the later argument [-Werror=calloc-transposed-args]
526 | ed = kcalloc(sizeof(struct qbman_eq_desc), 32, GFP_KERNEL);
| ^~~~~~
drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c:526:29: note: earlier argument should specify number of elements, later size of each element
Since the two are only multiplied, the order does not change the
behavior, so just fix it now to shut up the compiler warning.
Dmity independently came up with the same fix.
Fixes: 5c4a5999b245 ("soc: fsl: dpio: avoid stack usage warning")
Reported-by: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@...dex.ru>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c
index 1d2b27e3ea63f..b811446e0fa55 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c
@@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ int dpaa2_io_service_enqueue_multiple_desc_fq(struct dpaa2_io *d,
struct qbman_eq_desc *ed;
int i, ret;
- ed = kcalloc(sizeof(struct qbman_eq_desc), 32, GFP_KERNEL);
+ ed = kcalloc(32, sizeof(struct qbman_eq_desc), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ed)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists