linux-kernel - [PATCH 6.8 567/715] f2fs: fix to avoid potential panic during recovery

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240324223455.1342824-568-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 18:32:26 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>,
	Zhiguo Niu <zhiguo.niu@...soc.com>,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.8 567/715] f2fs: fix to avoid potential panic during recovery

From: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>

[ Upstream commit 21ec68234826b1b54ab980a8df6e33c74cfbee58 ]

During recovery, if FAULT_BLOCK is on, it is possible that
f2fs_reserve_new_block() will return -ENOSPC during recovery,
then it may trigger panic.

Also, if fault injection rate is 1 and only FAULT_BLOCK fault
type is on, it may encounter deadloop in loop of block reservation.

Let's change as below to fix these issues:
- remove bug_on() to avoid panic.
- limit the loop count of block reservation to avoid potential
deadloop.

Fixes: 956fa1ddc132 ("f2fs: fix to check return value of f2fs_reserve_new_block()")
Reported-by: Zhiguo Niu <zhiguo.niu@...soc.com>
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/f2fs/f2fs.h     |  5 +++++
 fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
index 03c0d2e996fff..cadda74e06f61 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
@@ -75,6 +75,11 @@ struct f2fs_fault_info {
 
 extern const char *f2fs_fault_name[FAULT_MAX];
 #define IS_FAULT_SET(fi, type) ((fi)->inject_type & BIT(type))
+
+/* maximum retry count for injected failure */
+#define DEFAULT_FAILURE_RETRY_COUNT		8
+#else
+#define DEFAULT_FAILURE_RETRY_COUNT		1
 #endif
 
 /*
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
index d0f24ccbd1ac6..aad1d1a9b3d64 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
@@ -611,6 +611,19 @@ static int check_index_in_prev_nodes(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int f2fs_reserve_new_block_retry(struct dnode_of_data *dn)
+{
+	int i, err = 0;
+
+	for (i = DEFAULT_FAILURE_RETRY_COUNT; i > 0; i--) {
+		err = f2fs_reserve_new_block(dn);
+		if (!err)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	return err;
+}
+
 static int do_recover_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct inode *inode,
 					struct page *page)
 {
@@ -712,14 +725,8 @@ static int do_recover_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct inode *inode,
 		 */
 		if (dest == NEW_ADDR) {
 			f2fs_truncate_data_blocks_range(&dn, 1);
-			do {
-				err = f2fs_reserve_new_block(&dn);
-				if (err == -ENOSPC) {
-					f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
-					break;
-				}
-			} while (err &&
-				IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_F2FS_FAULT_INJECTION));
+
+			err = f2fs_reserve_new_block_retry(&dn);
 			if (err)
 				goto err;
 			continue;
@@ -727,16 +734,8 @@ static int do_recover_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct inode *inode,
 
 		/* dest is valid block, try to recover from src to dest */
 		if (f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, dest, META_POR)) {
-
 			if (src == NULL_ADDR) {
-				do {
-					err = f2fs_reserve_new_block(&dn);
-					if (err == -ENOSPC) {
-						f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
-						break;
-					}
-				} while (err &&
-					IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_F2FS_FAULT_INJECTION));
+				err = f2fs_reserve_new_block_retry(&dn);
 				if (err)
 					goto err;
 			}
-- 
2.43.0