linux-kernel - [PATCH 6.8 602/715] afs: Don't cache preferred address

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240324223455.1342824-603-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 18:33:01 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
	linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.8 602/715] afs: Don't cache preferred address

From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>

[ Upstream commit 83505bde45e347f1451d007b3ddd7f06cee4c269 ]

In the AFS fileserver rotation algorithm, don't cache the preferred address
for the server as that will override the explicit preference if a
non-preferred address responds first.

Fixes: 495f2ae9e355 ("afs: Fix fileserver rotation")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240313081505.3060173-2-dhowells@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>
cc: linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/afs/rotate.c | 21 ++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/afs/rotate.c b/fs/afs/rotate.c
index 700a27bc8c257..ed04bd1eeae89 100644
--- a/fs/afs/rotate.c
+++ b/fs/afs/rotate.c
@@ -602,6 +602,8 @@ bool afs_select_fileserver(struct afs_operation *op)
 		goto wait_for_more_probe_results;
 
 	alist = op->estate->addresses;
+	best_prio = -1;
+	addr_index = 0;
 	for (i = 0; i < alist->nr_addrs; i++) {
 		if (alist->addrs[i].prio > best_prio) {
 			addr_index = i;
@@ -609,9 +611,7 @@ bool afs_select_fileserver(struct afs_operation *op)
 		}
 	}
 
-	addr_index = READ_ONCE(alist->preferred);
-	if (!test_bit(addr_index, &set))
-		addr_index = __ffs(set);
+	alist->preferred = addr_index;
 
 	op->addr_index = addr_index;
 	set_bit(addr_index, &op->addr_tried);
@@ -656,12 +656,6 @@ bool afs_select_fileserver(struct afs_operation *op)
 next_server:
 	trace_afs_rotate(op, afs_rotate_trace_next_server, 0);
 	_debug("next");
-	ASSERT(op->estate);
-	alist = op->estate->addresses;
-	if (op->call_responded &&
-	    op->addr_index != READ_ONCE(alist->preferred) &&
-	    test_bit(alist->preferred, &op->addr_tried))
-		WRITE_ONCE(alist->preferred, op->addr_index);
 	op->estate = NULL;
 	goto pick_server;
 
@@ -690,14 +684,7 @@ bool afs_select_fileserver(struct afs_operation *op)
 failed:
 	trace_afs_rotate(op, afs_rotate_trace_failed, 0);
 	op->flags |= AFS_OPERATION_STOP;
-	if (op->estate) {
-		alist = op->estate->addresses;
-		if (op->call_responded &&
-		    op->addr_index != READ_ONCE(alist->preferred) &&
-		    test_bit(alist->preferred, &op->addr_tried))
-			WRITE_ONCE(alist->preferred, op->addr_index);
-		op->estate = NULL;
-	}
+	op->estate = NULL;
 	_leave(" = f [failed %d]", afs_op_error(op));
 	return false;
 }
-- 
2.43.0