linux-kernel - [PATCH 6.1 069/451] lib: memcpy_kunit: Fix an invalid format specifier in an assertion msg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240324231207.1351418-70-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:05:45 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.1 069/451] lib: memcpy_kunit: Fix an invalid format specifier in an assertion msg

From: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit 0a549ed22c3c7cc6da5c5f5918efd019944489a5 ]

The 'i' passed as an assertion message is a size_t, so should use '%zu',
not '%d'.

This was found by annotating the _MSG() variants of KUnit's assertions
to let gcc validate the format strings.

Fixes: bb95ebbe89a7 ("lib: Introduce CONFIG_MEMCPY_KUNIT_TEST")
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Reviewed-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 lib/memcpy_kunit.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/memcpy_kunit.c b/lib/memcpy_kunit.c
index 2b5cc70ac53fc..dbedd99aa6163 100644
--- a/lib/memcpy_kunit.c
+++ b/lib/memcpy_kunit.c
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ struct some_bytes {
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(instance.data) != 32);	\
 	for (size_t i = 0; i < sizeof(instance.data); i++) {	\
 		KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, instance.data[i], v, \
-			"line %d: '%s' not initialized to 0x%02x @ %d (saw 0x%02x)\n", \
+			"line %d: '%s' not initialized to 0x%02x @ %zu (saw 0x%02x)\n", \
 			__LINE__, #instance, v, i, instance.data[i]);	\
 	}	\
 } while (0)
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ struct some_bytes {
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(one) != sizeof(two)); \
 	for (size_t i = 0; i < sizeof(one); i++) {	\
 		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, one.data[i], two.data[i], \
-			"line %d: %s.data[%d] (0x%02x) != %s.data[%d] (0x%02x)\n", \
+			"line %d: %s.data[%zu] (0x%02x) != %s.data[%zu] (0x%02x)\n", \
 			__LINE__, #one, i, one.data[i], #two, i, two.data[i]); \
 	}	\
 	kunit_info(test, "ok: " TEST_OP "() " name "\n");	\
-- 
2.43.0