[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240324223455.1342824-653-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 18:33:51 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>,
Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@...wei.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.8 652/715] cpufreq: Fix per-policy boost behavior on SoCs using cpufreq_boost_set_sw()
From: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>
[ Upstream commit f37a4d6b4a2c77414e8b9d25dd5ee31537ce9b00 ]
In the existing code, per-policy flags don't have any impact i.e.
if cpufreq_driver boost is enabled and boost is disabled for one or
more of the policies, the cpufreq driver will behave as if boost is
enabled.
Fix this by incorporating per-policy boost flag in the policy->max
computation used in cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo and setting the
default per-policy boost to mirror the cpufreq_driver boost flag.
Fixes: 218a06a79d9a ("cpufreq: Support per-policy performance boost")
Reported-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>
Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>
Tested-by:Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@...wei.com> <mailto:zouyipeng@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@...wei.com> <mailto:zouyipeng@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 44db4f59c4cc6..7d570b44777ac 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -644,14 +644,16 @@ static ssize_t store_local_boost(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
if (policy->boost_enabled == enable)
return count;
+ policy->boost_enabled = enable;
+
cpus_read_lock();
ret = cpufreq_driver->set_boost(policy, enable);
cpus_read_unlock();
- if (ret)
+ if (ret) {
+ policy->boost_enabled = !policy->boost_enabled;
return ret;
-
- policy->boost_enabled = enable;
+ }
return count;
}
@@ -1419,6 +1421,9 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
goto out_free_policy;
}
+ /* Let the per-policy boost flag mirror the cpufreq_driver boost during init */
+ policy->boost_enabled = cpufreq_boost_enabled() && policy_has_boost_freq(policy);
+
/*
* The initialization has succeeded and the policy is online.
* If there is a problem with its frequency table, take it
@@ -2755,11 +2760,12 @@ int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state)
cpus_read_lock();
for_each_active_policy(policy) {
+ policy->boost_enabled = state;
ret = cpufreq_driver->set_boost(policy, state);
- if (ret)
+ if (ret) {
+ policy->boost_enabled = !policy->boost_enabled;
goto err_reset_state;
-
- policy->boost_enabled = state;
+ }
}
cpus_read_unlock();
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
index c4d4643b6ca65..c17dc51a5a022 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
freq = pos->frequency;
- if (!cpufreq_boost_enabled()
+ if ((!cpufreq_boost_enabled() || !policy->boost_enabled)
&& (pos->flags & CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ))
continue;
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists