linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.15 223/317] drm/tidss: Fix initial plane zpos values

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240324233458.1352854-224-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:33:23 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>,
	Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@...com>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15 223/317] drm/tidss: Fix initial plane zpos values

From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>

[ Upstream commit 3ec948ccb2c4b99e8fbfdd950adbe92ea577b395 ]

When the driver sets up the zpos property it sets the default zpos value
to the HW id of the plane. That is fine as such, but as on many DSS
versions the driver arranges the DRM planes in a different order than
the HW planes (to keep the non-scalable planes first), this leads to odd
initial zpos values. An example is J721e, where the initial zpos values
for DRM planes are 1, 3, 0, 2.

In theory the userspace should configure the zpos values properly when
using multiple planes, and in that sense the initial zpos values
shouldn't matter, but there's really no reason not to fix this and help
the userspace apps which don't handle zpos perfectly. In particular,
some versions of Weston seem to have issues dealing with the planes
with the current default zpos values.

So let's change the zpos values for the DRM planes to 0, 1, 2, 3.

Another option would be to configure the planes marked as primary planes
to zpos 0. On a two display system this would give us plane zpos values
of 0, 0, 1, 2. The end result and behavior would be very similar in this
option, and I'm not aware that this would actually help us in any way.
So, to keep the code simple, I opted for the 0, 1, 2, 3 values.

Fixes: 32a1795f57ee ("drm/tidss: New driver for TI Keystone platform Display SubSystem")
Reviewed-by: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@...com>
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240213-tidss-fixes-v1-1-d709e8dfa505@ideasonboard.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_plane.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_plane.c
index 217415ec8eea1..8ccd7d31c01b3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_plane.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_plane.c
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ struct tidss_plane *tidss_plane_create(struct tidss_device *tidss,

 	drm_plane_helper_add(&tplane->plane, &tidss_plane_helper_funcs);

-	drm_plane_create_zpos_property(&tplane->plane, hw_plane_id, 0,
+	drm_plane_create_zpos_property(&tplane->plane, tidss->num_planes, 0,
 				       num_planes - 1);

 	ret = drm_plane_create_color_properties(&tplane->plane,
-- 
2.43.0