[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240324234027.1354210-227-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:40:14 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Yewon Choi <woni9911@...il.com>,
Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@...el.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 226/238] rds: introduce acquire/release ordering in acquire/release_in_xmit()
From: Yewon Choi <woni9911@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit 1422f28826d2a0c11e5240b3e951c9e214d8656e ]
acquire/release_in_xmit() work as bit lock in rds_send_xmit(), so they
are expected to ensure acquire/release memory ordering semantics.
However, test_and_set_bit/clear_bit() don't imply such semantics, on
top of this, following smp_mb__after_atomic() does not guarantee release
ordering (memory barrier actually should be placed before clear_bit()).
Instead, we use clear_bit_unlock/test_and_set_bit_lock() here.
Fixes: 0f4b1c7e89e6 ("rds: fix rds_send_xmit() serialization")
Fixes: 1f9ecd7eacfd ("RDS: Pass rds_conn_path to rds_send_xmit()")
Signed-off-by: Yewon Choi <woni9911@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@...el.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZfQUxnNTO9AJmzwc@libra05
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
net/rds/send.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rds/send.c b/net/rds/send.c
index 65eeb82cb5de5..1923eaa91e939 100644
--- a/net/rds/send.c
+++ b/net/rds/send.c
@@ -103,13 +103,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rds_send_path_reset);
static int acquire_in_xmit(struct rds_conn_path *cp)
{
- return test_and_set_bit(RDS_IN_XMIT, &cp->cp_flags) == 0;
+ return test_and_set_bit_lock(RDS_IN_XMIT, &cp->cp_flags) == 0;
}
static void release_in_xmit(struct rds_conn_path *cp)
{
- clear_bit(RDS_IN_XMIT, &cp->cp_flags);
- smp_mb__after_atomic();
+ clear_bit_unlock(RDS_IN_XMIT, &cp->cp_flags);
/*
* We don't use wait_on_bit()/wake_up_bit() because our waking is in a
* hot path and finding waiters is very rare. We don't want to walk
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists