linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 176/183] octeontx2-af: Use separate handlers for interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240324234638.1355609-177-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:46:29 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 176/183] octeontx2-af: Use separate handlers for interrupts

From: Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>

[ Upstream commit 50e60de381c342008c0956fd762e1c26408f372c ]

For PF to AF interrupt vector and VF to AF vector same
interrupt handler is registered which is causing race condition.
When two interrupts are raised to two CPUs at same time
then two cores serve same event corrupting the data.

Fixes: 7304ac4567bc ("octeontx2-af: Add mailbox IRQ and msg handlers")
Signed-off-by: Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu.c
index 02b4620f7368a..9c6307186505a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu.c
@@ -1708,10 +1708,9 @@ static void rvu_queue_work(struct mbox_wq_info *mw, int first,
 	}
 }
 
-static irqreturn_t rvu_mbox_intr_handler(int irq, void *rvu_irq)
+static irqreturn_t rvu_mbox_pf_intr_handler(int irq, void *rvu_irq)
 {
 	struct rvu *rvu = (struct rvu *)rvu_irq;
-	int vfs = rvu->vfs;
 	u64 intr;
 
 	intr = rvu_read64(rvu, BLKADDR_RVUM, RVU_AF_PFAF_MBOX_INT);
@@ -1723,6 +1722,18 @@ static irqreturn_t rvu_mbox_intr_handler(int irq, void *rvu_irq)
 
 	rvu_queue_work(&rvu->afpf_wq_info, 0, rvu->hw->total_pfs, intr);
 
+	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t rvu_mbox_intr_handler(int irq, void *rvu_irq)
+{
+	struct rvu *rvu = (struct rvu *)rvu_irq;
+	int vfs = rvu->vfs;
+	u64 intr;
+
+	/* Sync with mbox memory region */
+	rmb();
+
 	/* Handle VF interrupts */
 	if (vfs > 64) {
 		intr = rvupf_read64(rvu, RVU_PF_VFPF_MBOX_INTX(1));
@@ -2035,7 +2046,7 @@ static int rvu_register_interrupts(struct rvu *rvu)
 	/* Register mailbox interrupt handler */
 	sprintf(&rvu->irq_name[RVU_AF_INT_VEC_MBOX * NAME_SIZE], "RVUAF Mbox");
 	ret = request_irq(pci_irq_vector(rvu->pdev, RVU_AF_INT_VEC_MBOX),
-			  rvu_mbox_intr_handler, 0,
+			  rvu_mbox_pf_intr_handler, 0,
 			  &rvu->irq_name[RVU_AF_INT_VEC_MBOX * NAME_SIZE], rvu);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(rvu->dev,
-- 
2.43.0