[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240324224720.1345309-10-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 18:35:35 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@...amperecomputing.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.7 009/713] perf/arm-cmn: Workaround AmpereOneX errata AC04_MESH_1 (incorrect child count)
From: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@...amperecomputing.com>
[ Upstream commit 50572064ec7109b00eef8880e905f55861c8b3de ]
AmpereOneX mesh implementation has a bug in HN-P nodes that makes them
report incorrect child count. The failing crosspoints report 8 children
while they only have two.
When the driver tries to access the inexistent child nodes, it believes it
has reached an invalid node type and probing fails. The workaround is to
ignore those incorrect child nodes and continue normally.
Signed-off-by: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@...amperecomputing.com>
[ rm: rewrote simpler generalised version ]
Tested-by: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@...amperecomputing.com>
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ce4b1442135fe03d0de41859b04b268c88c854a3.1707498577.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c b/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
index c584165b13bab..7e3aa7e2345fa 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
@@ -2305,6 +2305,17 @@ static int arm_cmn_discover(struct arm_cmn *cmn, unsigned int rgn_offset)
dev_dbg(cmn->dev, "ignoring external node %llx\n", reg);
continue;
}
+ /*
+ * AmpereOneX erratum AC04_MESH_1 makes some XPs report a bogus
+ * child count larger than the number of valid child pointers.
+ * A child offset of 0 can only occur on CMN-600; otherwise it
+ * would imply the root node being its own grandchild, which
+ * we can safely dismiss in general.
+ */
+ if (reg == 0 && cmn->part != PART_CMN600) {
+ dev_dbg(cmn->dev, "bogus child pointer?\n");
+ continue;
+ }
arm_cmn_init_node_info(cmn, reg & CMN_CHILD_NODE_ADDR, dn);
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists