[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3b38abb9-c3ac-4b55-889a-424396f1113d@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 09:22:59 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>, peter.griffin@...aro.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org
Cc: alim.akhtar@...sung.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andre.draszik@...aro.org,
willmcvicker@...gle.com, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: exynos: gs101: define all PERIC USI nodes
On 22/03/2024 14:39, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>>
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>
> I'd like to respin this patch. Any preference on coding style for
> #address-cells and #size-cells? I guess they shall be above ranges
> property if present.
No, ranges should be just after reg, because it encodes often the same
or similar information (see also DTS Coding Style). I don't have
guideline, can be anywhere before vendor properties.
>
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&hsi2c1_bus>;
>>
>> Please reverse two lines, first pinctrl-0 then pinctrl-names. I know we
>
> Ok.
>
>> did not follow this convention till now, but at least new code can be
>> correct. Also clocks should be before pinctrl, so we keep some sort of
>> alphabetical order.
>
> Ok.
>
> I guess the order shall be:
>
> 1. compatible
> 2. reg
3. ranges
> 3. #address-cells (if applicable)
> #size-cells (if applicable)
> 5. Standard/common properties ordered alphabetically (ex. clocks,
> interrupts, pinctrl)
> 6. vendor-specific properties
> 7. status (if applicable)
>
Rest looks fine, thanks.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists