linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] thermal: More separation between the core and drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 14:33:27 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
 Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
 Stanislaw Gruszka <stanislaw.gruszka@...ux.intel.com>,
 Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] thermal: More separation between the core and
 drivers

Hi Rafael,

thank you for this series.

It has been reported a regression with commit cf3986f8c01d3. I'm 
investigating and confirming it. If it is the case a revert may impact 
this series.

On 25/03/2024 14:10, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
> 
> This is an update of
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/4558384.LvFx2qVVIh@kreacher/
> 
> which is a resend of the series with one extra patch added.  That extra patch
> is related to
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20240306085428.88011-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org/
> 
> The original description of the first two patches still applies:
> 
>> Patch [1/2] is based on the observation that the threshold field in struct
>> thermal_trip really should be core-internal and to make that happen it
>> introduces a wrapper structure around struct thermal_trip for internal
>> use in the core.
>>
>> Patch [2/2] moves the definition of the new structure and the struct
>> thermal_zone_device one to a local header file in the core to enforce
>> more separation between the core and drivers.
>>
>> The patches are not expected to introduce any observable differences in
>> behavior, so please let me know if you see any of that.
> 

-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog