linux-kernel - Re: In kernel virtual HID devices (was Future handling of complex RGB devices on Linux v3)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <siebkhaauocqkuox73q2e5p2mbsyc7j4gvpzfvt4c3gvncdpap@oxh5pp4gxpuo>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:56:49 +0100
From: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: Werner Sembach <wse@...edocomputers.com>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, 
	jikos@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jelle van der Waa <jelle@...aa.nl>, 
	Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>, 
	"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org, ojeda@...nel.org, 
	linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Gregor Riepl <onitake@...il.com>
Subject: Re: In kernel virtual HID devices (was Future handling of complex
 RGB devices on Linux v3)

On Mar 25 2024, Hans de Goede wrote:
> +Cc: Bentiss, Jiri
> 
> Hi Werner,
> 
> On 3/20/24 12:16 PM, Werner Sembach wrote:
> > Hi Hans and the others,
> > 
> > Am 22.02.24 um 14:14 schrieb Werner Sembach:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Thanks everyone for the exhaustive feedback. And at least this thread is a good comprehesive reference for the future ^^.
> >>
> >> To recap the hopefully final UAPI for complex RGB lighting devices:
> >>
> >> - By default there is a singular /sys/class/leds/* entry that treats the device as if it was a single zone RGB keyboard backlight with no special effects.
> >>
> >> - There is an accompanying misc device with the sysfs attributes "name", "device_type",  "firmware_version_string", "serial_number" for device identification and "use_leds_uapi" that defaults to 1.
> >>
> >>     - If set to 0 the /sys/class/leds/* entry disappears. The driver should keep the last state the backlight was in active if possible.
> >>
> >>     - If set 1 it appears again. The driver should bring it back to a static 1 zone setting while avoiding flicker if possible.
> >>
> >> - If the device is not controllable by for example hidraw, the misc device might also implement additional ioctls or sysfs attributes to allow a more complex low level control for the keyboard backlight. This is will be a highly vendor specific UAPI.
> > So in the OpenRGB issue thread https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/design/component-guidelines/dynamic-lighting-devices aka HID LampArray was mentioned. I did dismiss it because I thought that is only relevant for firmware, but I now stumbled upon the Virtual HID Framework (VHF) https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/hid/virtual-hid-framework--vhf- and now I wonder if an equivalent exists for Linux? A quick search did not yield any results for me.
> 
> Oh, interesting. I did not know about the HID LampArray API.
> 
> About your question about virtual HID devices, there is uHID,
> but as the name suggests this allows userspace to emulate a HID
> device.
> 
> In your case you want to do the emulation in kernel so that you
> can translate the proprietary WMI calls to something HID LampArray
> compatible.
> 
> I guess you could do this by defining your own HID transport driver,
> like how e.g. the i2c-hid code defines 1 i2c-hid parent + 1 HID
> "client" for each device which talks HID over i2c in the machine.
> 
> Bentiss, Jiri, do you have any input on this. Would something like
> that be acceptable to you (just based on the concept at least) ?

I just read the thread, and I think I now understand a little bit what
this request is :)

IMO working with the HID LampArray is the way forward. So I would
suggest to convert any non-HID RGB "LED display" that we are talking
about as a HID LampArray device through `hid_allocate_device()` in the
kernel. Basically what you are suggesting Hans. It's just that you don't
need a formal transport layer, just a child device that happens to be
HID.

The next question IMO is: do we want the kernel to handle such
machinery? Wouldn't it be simpler to just export the HID device and let
userspace talk to it through hidraw, like what OpenRGB does?

If the kernel already handles the custom protocol into generic HID, the
work for userspace is not too hard because they can deal with a known
protocol and can be cross-platform in their implementation.

I'm mentioning that cross-platform because SDL used to rely on the
input, LEDs, and other Linux peculiarities and eventually fell back on
using hidraw only because it's way more easier that way.

The other advantage of LampArray is that according to Microsoft's
document, new devices are going to support it out of the box, so they'll
be supported out of the box directly.

Most of the time my stance is "do not add new kernel API, you'll regret
it later". So in that case, given that we have a formally approved
standard, I would suggest to use it, and consider it your API.

Side note to self: I really need to resurrect the hidraw revoke series
so we could export those hidraw node to userspace with uaccess through
logind...

Cheers,
Benjamin