[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240325161106.00006041@Huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:11:06 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: <ira.weiny@...el.com>
CC: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Fan Ni <fan.ni@...sung.com>, "Navneet
Singh" <navneet.singh@...el.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, Alison Schofield
<alison.schofield@...el.com>, Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
<linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/26] cxl/mbox: Flag support for Dynamic Capacity
Devices (DCD)
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 16:18:04 -0700
ira.weiny@...el.com wrote:
> From: Navneet Singh <navneet.singh@...el.com>
>
> Per the CXL 3.1 specification software must check the Command Effects
> Log (CEL) to know if a device supports dynamic capacity (DC). If the
> device does support DC the specifics of the DC Regions (0-7) are read
> through the mailbox.
>
> Flag DC Device (DCD) commands in a device if they are supported.
> Subsequent patches will key off these bits to configure DCD.
>
> Signed-off-by: Navneet Singh <navneet.singh@...el.com>
> Co-developed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
This aligns with similar existing code etc and the opcodes are right so
There is a vague argument that maybe we shouldn't claim to support the
command in the debug message at that point in the patch set, but I don't
think we really care either way as expectation is this set should go
in all together.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists