linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/11] Staging: rtl8192e: Style guide Renames and Macros

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2024032515-prolonged-cornhusk-40e6@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 19:02:27 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Tree Davies <tdavies@...kphysics.net>
Cc: philipp.g.hortmann@...il.com, anjan@...i.ca,
	linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] Staging: rtl8192e: Style guide Renames and Macros

On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 07:01:50PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 04:55:41PM -0700, Tree Davies wrote:
> > 10/11 patches in this series rename variables to fix camelCase style
> > guide violations. The 11th patch implements the use of the BIT macro
> > instead of regular bit shift operations.
> > 
> > MOTE: Because patch #11 changes DEFINEs the compiler issues 
> > redefinition warnings. I don't know how to address these as part
> > of this submission. 
> > 
> > All changes Tested on Hardware
> 
> This patch series blows up the build, as the kernel test bot says, so I
> can't apply it, sorry.

Ah, it's just the last patch, I applied the first 10 now, thanks.

greg k-h