linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rcu: mollify sparse with RCU guard

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <35355d02-3eef-4860-847b-b7bbf05f4a31@moroto.mountain>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 21:28:32 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: mollify sparse with RCU guard

On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 05:41:22PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Also __acquire()/__release() are just empty macros without __CHECKER__.
> So not sure the indirection really is warranted for this special case.
> 
> I can add a comment in there, I guess, something like
> 
>  /* sparse doesn't actually "call" cleanup functions */
> 
> perhaps. That reminds me I forgot to CC Dan ...
> 

These are Sparse warnings, not Smatch warning... Smatch doesn't use any
of the Sparse locking annotations.  Smatch handles cleanup basically
correctly at this point.

regards,
dan carpenter