[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bf2c507d-2320-425e-8bc2-8a2858281559@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 20:21:24 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: gdsc: treat optional supplies as optional
On 25.03.2024 3:10 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 at 16:01, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 09:19:57AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>> Since commit deebc79b28d6 ("clk: qcom: gpucc-sc8280xp: Add external
>>> supply for GX gdsc") the GDSC supply must be treated as optional to
>>> avoid warnings like:
>>>
>>> gpu_cc-sc8280xp 3d90000.clock-controller: supply vdd-gfx not found, using dummy regulator
>>>
>>> on SC8280XP.
>>
>> Can this device actually run with the supply physically disconnected?
>
> On SC8280XP this is supplied via power-domain instead of the supply.
I think Dmitry is asking about this bit:
if (ret != -ENODEV)
return ret;
which is basically repeating the difference that _optional makes
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists