[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZgHNb3Led05RXRd2@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 19:15:59 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@...kajraghav.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
gost.dev@...sung.com, chandan.babu@...cle.com, hare@...e.de,
mcgrof@...nel.org, djwong@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, david@...morbit.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/11] xfs: make the calculation generic in
xfs_sb_validate_fsb_count()
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 06:02:52PM +0100, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote:
> From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
>
> Instead of assuming that PAGE_SHIFT is always higher than the blocklog,
> make the calculation generic so that page cache count can be calculated
> correctly for LBS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> index aabb25dc3efa..9cf800586da7 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> @@ -133,9 +133,16 @@ xfs_sb_validate_fsb_count(
> {
> ASSERT(PAGE_SHIFT >= sbp->sb_blocklog);
but ... you're still asserting that PAGE_SHIFT is larger than blocklog.
Shouldn't you delete that assertion?
> ASSERT(sbp->sb_blocklog >= BBSHIFT);
> + uint64_t max_index;
> + uint64_t max_bytes;
> +
> + if (check_shl_overflow(nblocks, sbp->sb_blocklog, &max_bytes))
> + return -EFBIG;
>
> /* Limited by ULONG_MAX of page cache index */
> - if (nblocks >> (PAGE_SHIFT - sbp->sb_blocklog) > ULONG_MAX)
> + max_index = max_bytes >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +
> + if (max_index > ULONG_MAX)
> return -EFBIG;
This kind of depends on the implementation details of the page cache.
We have MAX_LFS_FILESIZE to abstract that; maybe that should be used
here?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists