[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<AS1PR83MB05435D612E76C1F4488FE99CB4362@AS1PR83MB0543.EURPRD83.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 20:57:36 +0000
From: Konstantin Taranov <kotaranov@...rosoft.com>
To: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>, Konstantin Taranov
<kotaranov@...ux.microsoft.com>, "sharmaajay@...rosoft.com"
<sharmaajay@...rosoft.com>, "jgg@...pe.ca" <jgg@...pe.ca>, "leon@...nel.org"
<leon@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH rdma-next v2 4/4] RDMA/mana_ib: Use struct mana_ib_queue
for RAW QPs
> From: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH rdma-next v2 4/4] RDMA/mana_ib: Use struct
> mana_ib_queue for RAW QPs
>
> > struct mana_ib_qp {
> > struct ib_qp ibqp;
> >
> > - /* Work queue info */
> > - struct ib_umem *sq_umem;
> > - int sqe;
> > - u64 sq_gdma_region;
> > - u64 sq_id;
> > - mana_handle_t tx_object;
> > + struct mana_ib_raw_sq sq;
>
> Are you planning to add another type of sq for RC here?
>
There will be no more SQs. There will be rc_qp, ud_qp, uc_qp, which have several queues inside.
Should I still rename "struct mana_ib_raw_sq sq;" to "struct mana_ib_raw_sq raw_sq;" ?
Konstantin
> If yes, use raw_sq and rc_sq in struct fields.
>
> Long
Powered by blists - more mailing lists