linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Update mce

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:39:45 -0500
From: "Naik, Avadhut" <avadnaik@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
 tony.luck@...el.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 yazen.ghannam@....com, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
 Avadhut Naik <avadhut.naik@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Update mce_record tracepoint



On 3/25/2024 15:31, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 03:12:14PM -0500, Naik, Avadhut wrote:
>> Can this patchset be merged in? Or would you prefer me sending out
>> another revision with Steven's "Reviewed-by:" tag?
> 
> First of all, please do not top-post.
>
Apologies for that!
 
> Then, you were on Cc on the previous thread. Please summarize from it
> and put in the commit message *why* it is good to have each field added.
> 
> And then, above the tracepoint, I'd like you to add a rule which
> states what information can and should be added to the tracepoint. And
> no, "just because" is not good enough. The previous thread has hints.
> 

Thanks for the clarification! Will update accordingly.

> Thx.
> 

-- 
Thanks,
Avadhut Naik