linux-kernel - [PATCH 6.6 192/638] pwm: sti: Fix capture for st,pwm-num-chan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240324230116.1348576-193-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 18:53:49 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.6 192/638] pwm: sti: Fix capture for st,pwm-num-chan < st,capture-num-chan

From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>

[ Upstream commit 5f623835584f1c8d1030666796f40c47a448ce0b ]

The driver only used the number of pwm channels to set the pwm_chip's
npwm member. The result is that if there are more capture channels than
PWM channels specified in the device tree, only a part of the capture
channel is usable. Fix that by passing the bigger channel count to the
pwm framework. This makes it possible that the .apply() callback is
called with .hwpwm >= pwm_num_devs, catch that case and return an error
code.

Fixes: c97267ae831d ("pwm: sti: Add PWM capture callback")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240204212043.2951852-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.c
index c8800f84b917f..c782378dff5e5 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.c
@@ -395,8 +395,17 @@ static int sti_pwm_capture(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 static int sti_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 			 const struct pwm_state *state)
 {
+	struct sti_pwm_chip *pc = to_sti_pwmchip(chip);
+	struct sti_pwm_compat_data *cdata = pc->cdata;
+	struct device *dev = pc->dev;
 	int err;
 
+	if (pwm->hwpwm >= cdata->pwm_num_devs) {
+		dev_err(dev, "device %u is not valid for pwm mode\n",
+			pwm->hwpwm);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
@@ -647,7 +656,7 @@ static int sti_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	pc->chip.dev = dev;
 	pc->chip.ops = &sti_pwm_ops;
-	pc->chip.npwm = pc->cdata->pwm_num_devs;
+	pc->chip.npwm = max(cdata->pwm_num_devs, cdata->cpt_num_devs);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < cdata->cpt_num_devs; i++) {
 		struct sti_cpt_ddata *ddata = &cdata->ddata[i];
-- 
2.43.0