linux-kernel - [PATCH 6.6 479/638] modules: wait do_free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240324230116.1348576-480-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 18:58:36 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Changbin Du <changbin.du@...wei.com>,
	Eric Chanudet <echanude@...hat.com>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
	Xiaoyi Su <suxiaoyi@...wei.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.6 479/638] modules: wait do_free_init correctly

From: Changbin Du <changbin.du@...wei.com>

[ Upstream commit 8f8cd6c0a43ed637e620bbe45a8d0e0c2f4d5130 ]

The synchronization here is to ensure the ordering of freeing of a module
init so that it happens before W+X checking.  It is worth noting it is not
that the freeing was not happening, it is just that our sanity checkers
raced against the permission checkers which assume init memory is already
gone.

Commit 1a7b7d922081 ("modules: Use vmalloc special flag") moved calling
do_free_init() into a global workqueue instead of relying on it being
called through call_rcu(..., do_free_init), which used to allowed us call
do_free_init() asynchronously after the end of a subsequent grace period.
The move to a global workqueue broke the gaurantees for code which needed
to be sure the do_free_init() would complete with rcu_barrier().  To fix
this callers which used to rely on rcu_barrier() must now instead use
flush_work(&init_free_wq).

Without this fix, we still could encounter false positive reports in W+X
checking since the rcu_barrier() here can not ensure the ordering now.

Even worse, the rcu_barrier() can introduce significant delay.  Eric
Chanudet reported that the rcu_barrier introduces ~0.1s delay on a
PREEMPT_RT kernel.

  [    0.291444] Freeing unused kernel memory: 5568K
  [    0.402442] Run /sbin/init as init process

With this fix, the above delay can be eliminated.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240227023546.2490667-1-changbin.du@huawei.com
Fixes: 1a7b7d922081 ("modules: Use vmalloc special flag")
Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@...wei.com>
Tested-by: Eric Chanudet <echanude@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: Xiaoyi Su <suxiaoyi@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 include/linux/moduleloader.h | 8 ++++++++
 init/main.c                  | 5 +++--
 kernel/module/main.c         | 9 +++++++--
 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/moduleloader.h b/include/linux/moduleloader.h
index 001b2ce83832e..89b1e0ed98114 100644
--- a/include/linux/moduleloader.h
+++ b/include/linux/moduleloader.h
@@ -115,6 +115,14 @@ int module_finalize(const Elf_Ehdr *hdr,
 		    const Elf_Shdr *sechdrs,
 		    struct module *mod);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
+void flush_module_init_free_work(void);
+#else
+static inline void flush_module_init_free_work(void)
+{
+}
+#endif
+
 /* Any cleanup needed when module leaves. */
 void module_arch_cleanup(struct module *mod);
 
diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
index e24b0780fdff7..9e6ab6d593bd8 100644
--- a/init/main.c
+++ b/init/main.c
@@ -88,6 +88,7 @@
 #include <linux/sched/task_stack.h>
 #include <linux/context_tracking.h>
 #include <linux/random.h>
+#include <linux/moduleloader.h>
 #include <linux/list.h>
 #include <linux/integrity.h>
 #include <linux/proc_ns.h>
@@ -1402,11 +1403,11 @@ static void mark_readonly(void)
 	if (rodata_enabled) {
 		/*
 		 * load_module() results in W+X mappings, which are cleaned
-		 * up with call_rcu().  Let's make sure that queued work is
+		 * up with init_free_wq. Let's make sure that queued work is
 		 * flushed so that we don't hit false positives looking for
 		 * insecure pages which are W+X.
 		 */
-		rcu_barrier();
+		flush_module_init_free_work();
 		mark_rodata_ro();
 		rodata_test();
 	} else
diff --git a/kernel/module/main.c b/kernel/module/main.c
index 98fedfdb8db52..34d9e718c2c7d 100644
--- a/kernel/module/main.c
+++ b/kernel/module/main.c
@@ -2486,6 +2486,11 @@ static void do_free_init(struct work_struct *w)
 	}
 }
 
+void flush_module_init_free_work(void)
+{
+	flush_work(&init_free_wq);
+}
+
 #undef MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX
 #define MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX "module."
 /* Default value for module->async_probe_requested */
@@ -2590,8 +2595,8 @@ static noinline int do_init_module(struct module *mod)
 	 * Note that module_alloc() on most architectures creates W+X page
 	 * mappings which won't be cleaned up until do_free_init() runs.  Any
 	 * code such as mark_rodata_ro() which depends on those mappings to
-	 * be cleaned up needs to sync with the queued work - ie
-	 * rcu_barrier()
+	 * be cleaned up needs to sync with the queued work by invoking
+	 * flush_module_init_free_work().
 	 */
 	if (llist_add(&freeinit->node, &init_free_list))
 		schedule_work(&init_free_wq);
-- 
2.43.0