[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240326143544.GY403975@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 14:35:44 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
Zheng Yan <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>,
Sasha Neftin <sasha.neftin@...el.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] e1000e: Remove redundant runtime resume for
ethtool_ops
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 05:29:49PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
>
> e60b22c5b7e5 ("e1000e: fix accessing to suspended device") added
> ethtool_ops.begin() and .complete(), which used pm_runtime_get_sync() to
> resume suspended devices before any ethtool_ops callback and allow suspend
> after it completed.
>
> 3ef672ab1862 ("e1000e: ethtool unnecessarily takes device out of RPM
> suspend") removed ethtool_ops.begin() and .complete() and instead did
> pm_runtime_get_sync() only in the individual ethtool_ops callbacks that
> access device registers.
>
> Subsequently, f32a21376573 ("ethtool: runtime-resume netdev parent before
> ethtool ioctl ops") added pm_runtime_get_sync() in the dev_ethtool() path,
> so the device is resumed before *any* ethtool_ops callback, as it was
> before 3ef672ab1862.
>
> Remove most runtime resumes from ethtool_ops, which are now redundant
> because the resume has already been done by dev_ethtool(). This is
> essentially a revert of 3ef672ab1862 ("e1000e: ethtool unnecessarily takes
> device out of RPM suspend").
>
> There are a couple subtleties:
>
> - Prior to 3ef672ab1862, the device was resumed only for the duration of
> a single ethtool callback. 3ef672ab1862 changed e1000_set_phys_id() so
> the device was resumed for ETHTOOL_ID_ACTIVE and remained resumed until
> a subsequent callback for ETHTOOL_ID_INACTIVE. Preserve that part of
> 3ef672ab1862 so the device will not be runtime suspended while in the
> ETHTOOL_ID_ACTIVE state.
>
> - 3ef672ab1862 added "if (!pm_runtime_suspended())" in before reading the
> STATUS register in e1000_get_settings(). This was racy and is now
> unnecessary because dev_ethtool() has resumed the device already, so
> revert that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists