linux-kernel - RE: [xdp-hints] Re: [PATCH iwl-next,v4 1/1] igc: Add Tx hardware timestamp request for AF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 14:55:33 +0000
From: "Song, Yoong Siang" <yoong.siang.song@...el.com>
To: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>, "Bezdeka, Florian"
	<florian.bezdeka@...mens.com>, "Brandeburg, Jesse"
	<jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, "Nguyen, Anthony L"
	<anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "Eric
 Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
	<pabeni@...hat.com>, Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, "Alexei
 Starovoitov" <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Jesper
 Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, "Gomes, Vinicius"
	<vinicius.gomes@...el.com>, "Fijalkowski, Maciej"
	<maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
CC: "intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, "xdp-hints@...-project.net"
	<xdp-hints@...-project.net>
Subject: RE: [xdp-hints] Re: [PATCH iwl-next,v4 1/1] igc: Add Tx hardware
 timestamp request for AF_XDP zero-copy packet

On Tuesday, March 26, 2024 9:08 PM, Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de> wrote:
>Hi Florian,
>
>On Tue Mar 26 2024, Florian Bezdeka wrote:
>> On Mon, 2024-03-25 at 10:09 +0800, Song Yoong Siang wrote:
>>> This patch adds support to per-packet Tx hardware timestamp request to
>>> AF_XDP zero-copy packet via XDP Tx metadata framework. Please note that
>>> user needs to enable Tx HW timestamp capability via igc_ioctl() with
>>> SIOCSHWTSTAMP cmd before sending xsk Tx hardware timestamp request.
>>>
>>> Same as implementation in RX timestamp XDP hints kfunc metadata, Timer 0
>>> (adjustable clock) is used in xsk Tx hardware timestamp. i225/i226 have
>>> four sets of timestamping registers. *skb and *xsk_tx_buffer pointers
>>> are used to indicate whether the timestamping register is already occupied.
>>
>> Let me make sure that I fully understand that: In my own words:
>>
>> With that applied I'm able to get the point in time from the device
>> when a specific frame made it to the wire. I have to enable that
>> functionality using the mentioned ioctl() call first, and then check
>> the meta area (located in the umem right before the frame payload)
>> while consuming the completion queue/ring. Correct?

Hi Florian,

Yes, you are right. But before you pass the frame to driver, make sure
you request Tx metadata hardware timestamp feature by setting
XDP_TXMD_FLAGS_TIMESTAMP flag.
You can refer to tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
on how to do it. 

>>
>> If so, we now have a feedback channel for meta information for/from TX.
>> Are there any plans - or would it be possible - to support Earliest
>> TxTime First (NET_SCHED_ETF) QDisc based on that channel? In the past
>> we had the problem that we we're missing a feedback channel to
>> communicate back invalid lunch times.
>
>Just asking: How would that work? AFAIK XDP bypasses the Qdisc
>layer. Currently invalid Launch Times are accounted in the ETF Qdisc
>itself. Does that mean every driver has to take care of it?
>
>Thanks,
>Kurt

Florian & Kurt,

Yes, me and Stanislav are trying to add Earliest TxTime First / Launch Time to the framework.
Please refer to [1] for the patchset. The metadata framework will just pass the
Launch time value to driver, and driver need to handle the rest.
In the patchset, I am enabling it on stmmac driver only, but we need more drivers
to check whether the design is feasible for different drivers, cause each driver is
having their own limitation on launch time. Therefore, after this tx hwts patch accepted,
I will try to enable launch time on igc driver, and submit new version. 

Kurt is right that current metadata framework is lacking a way to feedback whether
the launch time is invalid or not. Maybe we can try to enable launch time without feedback,
then discuss about the status report design.

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/cover/20231203165129.1740512-1-yoong.siang.song@intel.com/

Thanks & Regards
Siang