linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "Bluetooth: hci_qca: Set BDA quirk bit if fwnode exists in DT"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZgL10ur0825LgWVK@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 17:20:34 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>
Cc: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
	Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
	linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Janaki Ramaiah Thota <quic_janathot@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "Bluetooth: hci_qca: Set BDA quirk bit if fwnode
 exists in DT"

Hi Luiz,

On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 04:18:16PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 10:17:13AM -0400, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 3:09 AM Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 04:31:53PM -0400, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:

> > > > All the
> > > > CI automation is done on bluetooth-next and if you are asking to be
> > > > done via bluetooth tree which is based on the latest rc that is not
> > > > how things works here, we usually first apply to bluetooth-next and in
> > > > case it needs to be backported then it later done via pull-request.
> > >
> > > The revert fixes a regression in 6.7-rc7 and should get to Linus as soon
> > > as possible and I assume you have some way to get fixes into mainline
> > > for the current development cycle.
> > 
> > Yeah I will send it later today to be included in the next rc release
> > and since it is marked for stable that shall trigger the process of
> > backporting it.
> > 
> > > The series fixes a critical bug in the Qualcomm driver and should
> > > similarly get into mainline as soon as possible to avoid having people
> > > unknowingly start relying on the broken behaviour (reversed address).
> > > The bug in this case is older, but since the bug is severe and we're
> > > only at rc1, I don't think this one should wait for 6.10 either.

I just double checked the bluetooth-next branch and everything looks
good now (revert + endianness fix series). Thanks!

Did I understand you correctly that you'll be able to get all five
commits into 6.9 during this development cycle (e.g. 6.9-rc2)?
 
Johan