lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 10:20:13 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
 "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
 "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Remove support for old UFSHCI versions

On 3/26/24 01:32, Avri Altman wrote:
> @@ -992,10 +976,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufshcd_is_hba_active);
>   
>   u32 ufshcd_get_local_unipro_ver(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>   {
> -	/* HCI version 1.0 and 1.1 supports UniPro 1.41 */
> -	if (hba->ufs_version <= ufshci_version(1, 1))
> -		return UFS_UNIPRO_VER_1_41;
> -	else
>   		return UFS_UNIPRO_VER_1_6;
>   }

Please fix the indentation of the only remaining return statement in
this function.

> @@ -5565,15 +5524,13 @@ void ufshcd_compl_one_cqe(struct ufs_hba *hba, int task_tag,
>   		ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd(hba, lrbp);
>   		/* Do not touch lrbp after scsi done */
>   		scsi_done(cmd);
> -	} else if (lrbp->command_type == UTP_CMD_TYPE_DEV_MANAGE ||
> -		   lrbp->command_type == UTP_CMD_TYPE_UFS_STORAGE) {
> -		if (hba->dev_cmd.complete) {
> -			if (cqe) {
> -				ocs = le32_to_cpu(cqe->status) & MASK_OCS;
> -				lrbp->utr_descriptor_ptr->header.ocs = ocs;
> -			}
> -			complete(hba->dev_cmd.complete);
> +	} else {
> +		WARN_ON(!hba->dev_cmd.complete);
> +		if (cqe) {
> +			ocs = le32_to_cpu(cqe->status) & MASK_OCS;
> +			lrbp->utr_descriptor_ptr->header.ocs = ocs;
>   		}
> +		complete(hba->dev_cmd.complete);
>   	}
>   }

The above is a functional change that has not been mentioned in the
patch description. Please undo the functional change or explain in the
patch description why this is considered correct.

Thanks,

Bart.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ