| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CACOAw_ypTqWMPac=5vr+LFamYmS4uegiJfeNvRG_h_yBnfJCLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 10:34:43 -0700
From: Daeho Jeong <daeho43@...il.com>
To: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
kernel-team@...roid.com, Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: prevent writing without fallocate()
for pinned files
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 8:39 PM Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On 2024/3/25 23:02, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 9:26 PM Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2024/3/21 1:42, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 2:38 AM Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2024/3/20 5:23, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> >>>>> From: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@...gle.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> In a case writing without fallocate(), we can't guarantee it's allocated
> >>>>> in the conventional area for zoned stroage.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@...gle.com>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> v2: covered the direct io case
> >>>>> v3: covered the mkwrite case
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> fs/f2fs/data.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> >>>>> fs/f2fs/file.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> >>>>> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> >>>>> index c21b92f18463..d3e5ab2736a6 100644
> >>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> >>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> >>>>> @@ -1584,8 +1584,11 @@ int f2fs_map_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct f2fs_map_blocks *map, int flag)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> /* use out-place-update for direct IO under LFS mode */
> >>>>> if (map->m_may_create &&
> >>>>> - (is_hole || (f2fs_lfs_mode(sbi) && flag == F2FS_GET_BLOCK_DIO))) {
> >>>>> - if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
> >>>>> + (is_hole || (f2fs_lfs_mode(sbi) && flag == F2FS_GET_BLOCK_DIO &&
> >>>>> + !f2fs_is_pinned_file(inode)))) {
> >>>>> + if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)) ||
> >>>>> + (f2fs_is_pinned_file(inode) && is_hole &&
> >>>>> + flag != F2FS_GET_BLOCK_PRE_DIO)) {
> >>>>> err = -EIO;
> >>>>> goto sync_out;
> >>>>> }
> >>>>> @@ -3378,6 +3381,8 @@ static int prepare_write_begin(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >>>>> f2fs_map_lock(sbi, flag);
> >>>>> locked = true;
> >>>>> } else if ((pos & PAGE_MASK) >= i_size_read(inode)) {
> >>>>> + if (f2fs_is_pinned_file(inode))
> >>>>> + return -EIO;
> >>>>> f2fs_map_lock(sbi, flag);
> >>>>> locked = true;
> >>>>> }
> >>>>> @@ -3407,6 +3412,11 @@ static int prepare_write_begin(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> if (!f2fs_lookup_read_extent_cache_block(inode, index,
> >>>>> &dn.data_blkaddr)) {
> >>>>> + if (f2fs_is_pinned_file(inode)) {
> >>>>> + err = -EIO;
> >>>>> + goto out;
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> if (locked) {
> >>>>> err = f2fs_reserve_block(&dn, index);
> >>>>> goto out;
> >>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> >>>>> index 82277e95c88f..4db3b21c804b 100644
> >>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> >>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> >>>>> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static vm_fault_t f2fs_vm_page_mkwrite(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> >>>>> struct inode *inode = file_inode(vmf->vma->vm_file);
> >>>>> struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
> >>>>> struct dnode_of_data dn;
> >>>>> - bool need_alloc = true;
> >>>>> + bool need_alloc = !f2fs_is_pinned_file(inode);
> >>>>
> >>>> Will this check races w/ pinfile get|set?
> >>>
> >>> Do you mean "set/clear" case? I believe "set" case is okay, since we
> >>
> >> Yup,
> >>
> >>> can't set if the inode already has a data block. For "clear" case, I
> >>
> >> However, we can set pinfile on written inode in regular block device:
> >
> > You're right. I missed it. Maybe I think we should keep the concept
> > consistent across devices regardless of zoned storage support. How
> > about preventing file pinning for already written inodes across all
> > device types? I am changing the pinfile concept by allowing the users
>
> I'm okay with that, or we can tries to migrate data block of target file
> from seq-zone to conv-zone or regular-device before setting it w/ pin flag...
I can't see lots of benefits by supporting file pinning for
pre-written inodes, while the design can become complicated. Since we
consolidate the way to support file pinning as fallocate() before
using it, we might as well not support pre-written inodes.
>
> Thanks,
>
> > to write on only fallocate()-ed space.
> >
> >>
> >> if (f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi) && F2FS_HAS_BLOCKS(inode)) {
> >> ret = -EFBIG;
> >> goto out;
> >> }
> >>
> >> Should we add the logic only if blkzoned feture is enabled?
> >>
> >>> believe mkwrite failure is okay in racy conditions caused by clearing
> >>> the pin flag. What do you think?
> >>
> >> Or we can use filemap_invalidate_lock() in f2fs_ioc_set_pin_file() to
> >> avoid the race condition?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>>> int err = 0;
> >>>>> vm_fault_t ret;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> @@ -114,19 +114,15 @@ static vm_fault_t f2fs_vm_page_mkwrite(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> >>>>> goto out_sem;
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> + set_new_dnode(&dn, inode, NULL, NULL, 0);
> >>>>> if (need_alloc) {
> >>>>> /* block allocation */
> >>>>> - set_new_dnode(&dn, inode, NULL, NULL, 0);
> >>>>> err = f2fs_get_block_locked(&dn, page->index);
> >>>>> - }
> >>>>> -
> >>>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_FS_COMPRESSION
> >>>>> - if (!need_alloc) {
> >>>>> - set_new_dnode(&dn, inode, NULL, NULL, 0);
> >>>>> + } else {
> >>>>> err = f2fs_get_dnode_of_data(&dn, page->index, LOOKUP_NODE);
> >>>>> f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
> >>>>> }
> >>>>> -#endif
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> if (err) {
> >>>>> unlock_page(page);
> >>>>> goto out_sem;
> >>>>> @@ -4611,6 +4607,10 @@ static int f2fs_preallocate_blocks(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
> >>>>> return ret;
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> + /* For pinned files, it should be fallocate()-ed in advance. */
> >>>>> + if (f2fs_is_pinned_file(inode))
> >>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> /* Do not preallocate blocks that will be written partially in 4KB. */
> >>>>> map.m_lblk = F2FS_BLK_ALIGN(pos);
> >>>>> map.m_len = F2FS_BYTES_TO_BLK(pos + count);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists