[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240326152230.3e692d83@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 15:22:30 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Nikita Kiryushin <kiryushin@...ud.ru>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, Frederic Weisbecker
<frederic@...nel.org>, Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>, Joel
Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>, Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lvc-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu-tasks: Update show_rcu_tasks_trace_gp_kthread
buffer size
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 20:48:39 +0300
Nikita Kiryushin <kiryushin@...ud.ru> wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> index 147b5945d67a..13ac514489c0 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> @@ -1992,7 +1992,7 @@ static int __init rcu_spawn_tasks_trace_kthread(void)
> #if !defined(CONFIG_TINY_RCU)
> void show_rcu_tasks_trace_gp_kthread(void)
> {
> - char buf[64];
> + char buf[87];
Why 87? as it's not even word size, and this is on the stack.
>
> sprintf(buf, "N%lu h:%lu/%lu/%lu",
Better yet, why not just use snprintf()?
snprintf(buf, 64, "N%lu h:%lu/%lu/%lu",
-- Steve
> data_race(n_trc_holdouts),
> --
Powered by blists - more mailing lists