linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: dmaengine: Add dmamux for CV18XX/SG200X series SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4a30ce5d-c308-4983-8c7b-d83ced6a9ef1@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 07:50:45 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>, Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>,
 Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt
 <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
 Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>, Liu Gui <kenneth.liu@...hgo.com>,
 Jingbao Qiu <qiujingbao.dlmu@...il.com>, dlan@...too.org,
 dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: dmaengine: Add dmamux for
 CV18XX/SG200X series SoC

On 26/03/2024 04:37, Frank Li wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 09:47:03AM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
>> The DMA IP of Sophgo CV18XX/SG200X is based on a DW AXI CORE, with
>> an additional channel remap register located in the top system control
>> area. The DMA channel is exclusive to each core.
>>
>> Add the dmamux binding for CV18XX/SG200X series SoC
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>
>> ---
>>  .../bindings/dma/sophgo,cv1800-dmamux.yaml    | 48 ++++++++++++++++
>>  include/dt-bindings/dma/cv1800-dma.h          | 55 +++++++++++++++++++
> 
> I remember checkpatch.pl require .h have seperate patch.

Why do you insist on that? Bindings header should be with binding.
That's incorrect advice.

Best regards,
Krzysztof