linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix broken erase in misc_cmd_type in exec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240326072512.GA8436@thinkpad>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 12:55:12 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
	Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com>,
	Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix broken erase in
 misc_cmd_type in exec_op

On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 11:30:47AM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:
> misc_cmd_type in exec_op have multiple problems. With commit a82990c8a409
> ("mtd: rawnand: qcom: Add read/read_start ops in exec_op path") it was
> reworked and generalized but actually broke the handling of the
> ERASE_BLOCK command.
> 
> Additional logic was added to the erase command cycle without clear
> explaination causing the erase command to be broken on testing it on
> a ipq806x nandc.
> 
> Fix the erase command by reverting the additional logic and only adding
> the NAND_DEV0_CFG0 additional call (required for erase command).
> 
> Fixes: a82990c8a409 ("mtd: rawnand: qcom: Add read/read_start ops in exec_op path")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes v2:
> - Split this and rework commit description and title
> 
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> index b079605c84d3..19d76e345a49 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> @@ -2830,9 +2830,8 @@ static int qcom_misc_cmd_type_exec(struct nand_chip *chip, const struct nand_sub
>  	nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_EXEC_CMD, 1);
>  
>  	write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_FLASH_CMD, instrs, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
> -	(q_op.cmd_reg == OP_BLOCK_ERASE) ? write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_DEV0_CFG0,
> -	2, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL) : read_reg_dma(nandc,
> -	NAND_FLASH_STATUS, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
> +	if (q_op.cmd_reg == OP_BLOCK_ERASE)
> +		write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_DEV0_CFG0, 2, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);

So this only avoids the call to, 'read_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_FLASH_STATUS, 1,
NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL)' if q_op.cmd_reg != OP_BLOCK_ERASE. But for q_op.cmd_reg ==
OP_BLOCK_ERASE, the result is the same.

I'm wondering how it results in fixing the OP_BLOCK_ERASE command.

Can you share the actual issue that you are seeing? Like error logs etc...

- Mani

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்