[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <37cb9bc9-88c0-4e2b-8f46-0f67b91bc5be@salutedevices.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 03:41:55 +0300
From: George Stark <gnstark@...utedevices.com>
To: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, <lars@...afoo.de>, <jic23@...nel.org>,
<linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>, "kernel@...utedevices.com"
<kernel@...utedevices.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] iio: adc: meson: consistently use bool/enum in
struct meson_sar_adc_param
Hello Martin
On 3/24/24 02:13, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> Consistently use bool for any register bit that enables/disables
> functionality and enum for register values where there's a choice
> between different settings. The aim is to make the code easier to read
> and understand by being more consistent. No functional changes intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/meson_saradc.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/meson_saradc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/meson_saradc.c
> index 2615d74534df..6b2af0c2bbc7 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/meson_saradc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/meson_saradc.c
> @@ -156,9 +156,9 @@
> #define MESON_SAR_ADC_REG11 0x2c
> #define MESON_SAR_ADC_REG11_BANDGAP_EN BIT(13)
> #define MESON_SAR_ADC_REG11_CMV_SEL BIT(6)
> - #define MESON_SAR_ADC_REG11_VREF_VOLTAGE BIT(5)
> - #define MESON_SAR_ADC_REG11_EOC BIT(1)
> - #define MESON_SAR_ADC_REG11_VREF_SEL BIT(0)
> + #define MESON_SAR_ADC_REG11_VREF_VOLTAGE BIT(5)
> + #define MESON_SAR_ADC_REG11_EOC BIT(1)
> + #define MESON_SAR_ADC_REG11_VREF_SEL BIT(0)
>
> #define MESON_SAR_ADC_REG13 0x34
> #define MESON_SAR_ADC_REG13_12BIT_CALIBRATION_MASK GENMASK(13, 8)
> @@ -224,6 +224,11 @@ enum meson_sar_adc_vref_sel {
> VREF_VDDA = 1,
> };
>
> +enum meson_sar_adc_vref_voltage {
> + VREF_VOLTAGE_0V9 = 0,
> + VREF_VOLTAGE_1V8 = 1,
> +};
> +
> enum meson_sar_adc_avg_mode {
> NO_AVERAGING = 0x0,
> MEAN_AVERAGING = 0x1,
> @@ -321,13 +326,13 @@ struct meson_sar_adc_param {
> u8 temperature_trimming_bits;
> unsigned int temperature_multiplier;
> unsigned int temperature_divider;
> - u8 disable_ring_counter;
> + bool disable_ring_counter;
> bool has_reg11;
> bool has_vref_select;
> - u8 vref_select;
> - u8 cmv_select;
> - u8 adc_eoc;
The reason to choose u8 type over bool was that those are not actually
bool values but direct values of hw register bits. We have little
information about real meaning of these bits so it won't help much to
add bool layer and keep real values in the init code instead of param
section (adc_eoc, cmv_select).
bool disable_ring_counter will look deceptive too because it doesn't
say whether disable ring_counter or not (we always disable it) but
how to disable it (write 0 or 1)
I think the poor choice was not the type of variables but their names:
u8 adc_eoc_bit;
u8 cmv_select_bit;
u8 disable_ring_counter_bit;
would be clearer.
> - enum meson_sar_adc_vref_sel vref_voltage;
> + bool cmv_select;
> + bool adc_eoc;
> + enum meson_sar_adc_vref_sel vref_select;
> + enum meson_sar_adc_vref_voltage vref_voltage;
> };
>
> struct meson_sar_adc_data {
> @@ -982,14 +987,16 @@ static int meson_sar_adc_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> MESON_SAR_ADC_DELTA_10_TS_REVE0, 0);
> }
>
> - regval = FIELD_PREP(MESON_SAR_ADC_REG3_CTRL_CONT_RING_COUNTER_EN,
> - priv->param->disable_ring_counter);
> + if (priv->param->disable_ring_counter)
> + regval = MESON_SAR_ADC_REG3_CTRL_CONT_RING_COUNTER_EN;
> + else
> + regval = 0;
> regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, MESON_SAR_ADC_REG3,
> MESON_SAR_ADC_REG3_CTRL_CONT_RING_COUNTER_EN,
> regval);
>
> if (priv->param->has_reg11) {
> - regval = FIELD_PREP(MESON_SAR_ADC_REG11_EOC, priv->param->adc_eoc);
> + regval = priv->param->adc_eoc ? MESON_SAR_ADC_REG11_EOC : 0;
> regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, MESON_SAR_ADC_REG11,
> MESON_SAR_ADC_REG11_EOC, regval);
>
> @@ -1005,8 +1012,7 @@ static int meson_sar_adc_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, MESON_SAR_ADC_REG11,
> MESON_SAR_ADC_REG11_VREF_VOLTAGE, regval);
>
> - regval = FIELD_PREP(MESON_SAR_ADC_REG11_CMV_SEL,
> - priv->param->cmv_select);
> + regval = priv->param->cmv_select ? MESON_SAR_ADC_REG11_CMV_SEL : 0;
> regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, MESON_SAR_ADC_REG11,
> MESON_SAR_ADC_REG11_CMV_SEL, regval);
> }
> @@ -1225,8 +1231,8 @@ static const struct meson_sar_adc_param meson_sar_adc_gxbb_param = {
> .regmap_config = &meson_sar_adc_regmap_config_gxbb,
> .resolution = 10,
> .has_reg11 = true,
> - .vref_voltage = 1,
> - .cmv_select = 1,
> + .vref_voltage = VREF_VOLTAGE_1V8,
> + .cmv_select = true,
> };
>
> static const struct meson_sar_adc_param meson_sar_adc_gxl_param = {
> @@ -1237,8 +1243,8 @@ static const struct meson_sar_adc_param meson_sar_adc_gxl_param = {
> .resolution = 12,
> .disable_ring_counter = 1,
> .has_reg11 = true,
> - .vref_voltage = 1,
> - .cmv_select = 1,
> + .vref_voltage = VREF_VOLTAGE_1V8,
> + .cmv_select = true,
> };
>
> static const struct meson_sar_adc_param meson_sar_adc_axg_param = {
> @@ -1249,10 +1255,10 @@ static const struct meson_sar_adc_param meson_sar_adc_axg_param = {
> .resolution = 12,
> .disable_ring_counter = 1,
> .has_reg11 = true,
> - .vref_voltage = 1,
> + .vref_voltage = VREF_VOLTAGE_1V8,
> .has_vref_select = true,
> .vref_select = VREF_VDDA,
> - .cmv_select = 1,
> + .cmv_select = true,
> };
>
> static const struct meson_sar_adc_param meson_sar_adc_g12a_param = {
> @@ -1263,7 +1269,8 @@ static const struct meson_sar_adc_param meson_sar_adc_g12a_param = {
> .resolution = 12,
> .disable_ring_counter = 1,
> .has_reg11 = true,
> - .adc_eoc = 1,
> + .vref_voltage = VREF_VOLTAGE_0V9,
> + .adc_eoc = true,
> .has_vref_select = true,
> .vref_select = VREF_VDDA,
> };
--
Best regards
George
Powered by blists - more mailing lists