[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240326080305.402382-5-ebiggers@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 01:03:02 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"Chang S . Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] crypto: x86/aes-xts - wire up VAES + AVX2 implementation
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Add an AES-XTS implementation "xts-aes-vaes-avx2" for x86_64 CPUs with
the VAES, VPCLMULQDQ, and AVX2 extensions, but not AVX512 or AVX10.
This implementation uses ymm registers to operate on two AES blocks at a
time. The assembly code is instantiated using a macro so that most of
the source code is shared with other implementations.
This is the optimal implementation on AMD Zen 3. It should also be the
optimal implementation on Intel Alder Lake, which similarly supports
VAES but not AVX512. Comparing to xts-aes-aesni-avx on Zen 3,
xts-aes-vaes-avx2 provides 51% higher AES-256-XTS decryption throughput
with 4096-byte messages, or 19% higher with 512-byte messages.
A large improvement is also seen with CPUs that do support AVX512 (e.g.,
74% higher AES-256-XTS decryption throughput on Ice Lake with 4096-byte
messages), though the following patches add AVX512 optimized
implementations to get a bit more performance on those CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
---
arch/x86/crypto/aes-xts-avx-x86_64.S | 11 +++++++++++
arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/aes-xts-avx-x86_64.S b/arch/x86/crypto/aes-xts-avx-x86_64.S
index a8003fea97b7..87ae2139b7ca 100644
--- a/arch/x86/crypto/aes-xts-avx-x86_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/crypto/aes-xts-avx-x86_64.S
@@ -763,5 +763,16 @@ SYM_TYPED_FUNC_START(aes_xts_encrypt_aesni_avx)
aes_xts_crypt 1
SYM_FUNC_END(aes_xts_encrypt_aesni_avx)
SYM_TYPED_FUNC_START(aes_xts_decrypt_aesni_avx)
aes_xts_crypt 0
SYM_FUNC_END(aes_xts_decrypt_aesni_avx)
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_AS_VAES) && defined(CONFIG_AS_VPCLMULQDQ)
+.set VL, 32
+.set USE_AVX10, 0
+SYM_TYPED_FUNC_START(aes_xts_encrypt_vaes_avx2)
+ aes_xts_crypt 1
+SYM_FUNC_END(aes_xts_encrypt_vaes_avx2)
+SYM_TYPED_FUNC_START(aes_xts_decrypt_vaes_avx2)
+ aes_xts_crypt 0
+SYM_FUNC_END(aes_xts_decrypt_vaes_avx2)
+#endif /* CONFIG_AS_VAES && CONFIG_AS_VPCLMULQDQ */
diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c b/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c
index d5e33c396b3e..d958aa073c14 100644
--- a/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c
+++ b/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c
@@ -1293,10 +1293,13 @@ static struct skcipher_alg aes_xts_alg_##suffix = { \
}; \
\
static struct simd_skcipher_alg *aes_xts_simdalg_##suffix
DEFINE_XTS_ALG(aesni_avx, "xts-aes-aesni-avx", 500);
+#if defined(CONFIG_AS_VAES) && defined(CONFIG_AS_VPCLMULQDQ)
+DEFINE_XTS_ALG(vaes_avx2, "xts-aes-vaes-avx2", 600);
+#endif
static int __init register_xts_algs(void)
{
int err;
@@ -1304,18 +1307,33 @@ static int __init register_xts_algs(void)
return 0;
err = simd_register_skciphers_compat(&aes_xts_alg_aesni_avx, 1,
&aes_xts_simdalg_aesni_avx);
if (err)
return err;
+#if defined(CONFIG_AS_VAES) && defined(CONFIG_AS_VPCLMULQDQ)
+ if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AVX2) ||
+ !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_VAES) ||
+ !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_VPCLMULQDQ) ||
+ !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PCLMULQDQ) ||
+ !cpu_has_xfeatures(XFEATURE_MASK_SSE | XFEATURE_MASK_YMM, NULL))
+ return 0;
+ err = simd_register_skciphers_compat(&aes_xts_alg_vaes_avx2, 1,
+ &aes_xts_simdalg_vaes_avx2);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+#endif
return 0;
}
static void unregister_xts_algs(void)
{
if (aes_xts_simdalg_aesni_avx)
simd_unregister_skciphers(&aes_xts_alg_aesni_avx, 1,
&aes_xts_simdalg_aesni_avx);
+ if (aes_xts_simdalg_vaes_avx2)
+ simd_unregister_skciphers(&aes_xts_alg_vaes_avx2, 1,
+ &aes_xts_simdalg_vaes_avx2);
}
#else
static int __init register_xts_algs(void)
{
return 0;
--
2.44.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists