[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a6c54afa-b6f7-416a-b70c-072c6f9ea317@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 09:28:24 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik
<gor@...ux.ibm.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] s390/mm: shared zeropage + KVM fix and
optimization
On 26.03.24 08:38, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 03:13:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 22:59:52 +0100 David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Based on current mm-unstable. Maybe at least the second patch should
>>> go via the s390x tree, I think patch #1 could go that route as well.
>>
>> Taking both via the s390 tree is OK by me. I'll drop the mm.git copies
>> if/when these turn up in the linux-next feed.
>
> Considering the comments I would expect a v2 of this series at some
> time in the future.
Yes, I'm still waiting for more feedback. I'll likely resend tomorrow.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists