linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] platform/chrome: cros_ec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 09:46:26 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Pavan Holla <pholla@...omium.org>,
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
 Abhishek Pandit-Subedi <abhishekpandit@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] platform/chrome: cros_ec_ucsi: Implement UCSI PDC
 driver

On 26/03/2024 00:37, Pavan Holla wrote:
> Implementation of transport driver for UCSI. This driver will be used
> if the ChromeOS EC implements a PPM.
> 


> +static struct platform_driver cros_ucsi_driver = {
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = DRV_NAME,
> +		.pm = &cros_ucsi_pm_ops,
> +	},
> +	.probe = cros_ucsi_probe,
> +	.remove = cros_ucsi_remove,
> +};
> +
> +module_platform_driver(cros_ucsi_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("UCSI driver for ChromeOS EC.");
> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:" DRV_NAME);

You should not need MODULE_ALIAS() in normal cases. If you need it,
usually it means your device ID table is wrong (e.g. misses either
entries or MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE()). MODULE_ALIAS() is not a substitute
for incomplete ID table.

Using DRV_NAME here brings even more confusion...

Best regards,
Krzysztof