linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Give chance to build under !CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45a74a88-83da-95db-2cfb-3cd3a3e6d68f@loongson.cn>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 19:26:06 +0800
From: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Huacai Chen
 <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
 Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 loongson-kernel@...ts.loongnix.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Give chance to build under !CONFIG_SMP

On 03/26/2024 06:02 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26 2024 at 14:21, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
>>
>> This patch is based on 6.9-rc1. Please let me know if it is better to
>> split it into two patches, the first one is for arch/loongarch and the
>> second one is for drivers/irqchip.
>
> Why are you asking? It's documented that patches should be split, no?

OK, thanks for your reply, I read the document [1],
but I am not sure whether it is a single logical change.
I will split it into two patches and send them ASAP.

[1] 
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#separate-your-changes

Thanks,
Tiezhu